Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) vs Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)
A side-by-side comparison of Meta Platforms, Inc. and Wells Fargo & Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: META is classified in Communication Services; WFC is classified in Financial Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
$593.41Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
$86.87Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:02 PM EDT
Total return — META vs WFC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 14yMETA +1474.4%WFC +297.4%META compounded faster
META WFC
META vs WFC: by the numbers
- •META is the larger company ($1.51T vs $265.84B market cap).
- •WFC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.59 vs 21.60 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •META converts more revenue to profit (32.84% vs 17.54% net margin).
- •META grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.89% vs 9.78% CAGR).
- •WFC pays the higher dividend yield (2.06% vs 0.35%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | META | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.60 | 12.59 |
| Forward P/E | 18.03 | 12.02 |
| P/S ratio | 7.08 | 2.08 |
| P/B ratio | 6.25 | 1.49 |
| PEG ratio | 1.16 | 0.82 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.51 | N/A |
| FCF yield | 3.17% | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | META | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 81.94% | 64.50% |
| Operating margin | 41.21% | 21.17% |
| Net margin | 32.84% | 17.54% |
| ROE | 28.97% | 12.57% |
| ROIC | 17.95% | 3.16% |
Dividends
| Metric | META | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 2.06% |
| Payout ratio | 8.76% | 28.17% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | META | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 17.89% | 9.78% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 18.60% | 72.38% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 14.84% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.03% | 16.70% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, META or WFC?
- WFC has the lower trailing P/E: META trades at 21.60 and WFC at 12.59. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, META or WFC?
- Over the past five years, META grew revenue faster — META at a 17.89% CAGR versus WFC at 9.78%.
- Does META or WFC pay a bigger dividend?
- META yields 0.35% and WFC yields 2.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is META or WFC more profitable?
- META runs the higher net margin — META at 32.84% versus WFC at 17.54%.
- How have META and WFC total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, META delivered 17.02% and WFC delivered 9.12% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Meta Platforms P/E ratioWells Fargo & P/E ratioMeta Platforms dividend yieldWells Fargo & dividend yieldMeta Platforms ROEWells Fargo & ROEMeta Platforms operating marginWells Fargo & operating marginMeta Platforms revenue growthWells Fargo & revenue growthMeta Platforms free cash flowWells Fargo & free cash flow
Meta Platforms & Wells Fargo & appear in these rankings
Highest Dividend Yield StocksFastest Revenue Growth StocksHighest ROE StocksHighest Operating Margin Stocks
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.