Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)
A side-by-side comparison of Meta Platforms, Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: META is classified in Communication Services; PG is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
$593.41Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$148.75Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — META vs PG
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 14yMETA +1470.4%PG +249.7%META compounded faster
META PG
META vs PG: by the numbers
- •META is the larger company ($1.51T vs $346.38B market cap).
- •META trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (21.60 vs 21.73 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •META converts more revenue to profit (32.84% vs 19.22% net margin).
- •META grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.89% vs 2.98% CAGR).
- •PG pays the higher dividend yield (2.87% vs 0.35%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | META | PG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.60 | 21.73 |
| Forward P/E | 18.03 | 21.62 |
| P/S ratio | 7.08 | 4.14 |
| P/B ratio | 6.25 | 6.59 |
| PEG ratio | 1.16 | 3.01 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.51 | 16.53 |
| FCF yield | 3.17% | 4.18% |
Profitability
| Metric | META | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 81.94% | 50.33% |
| Operating margin | 41.21% | 23.24% |
| Net margin | 32.84% | 19.22% |
| ROE | 28.97% | 30.58% |
| ROIC | 17.95% | 16.47% |
Dividends
| Metric | META | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 2.87% |
| Payout ratio | 8.76% | 63.85% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | META | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 17.89% | 2.98% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 18.60% | 5.39% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 14.84% | -1.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.03% | 3.71% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, META or PG?
- META has the lower trailing P/E: META trades at 21.60 and PG at 21.73. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, META or PG?
- Over the past five years, META grew revenue faster — META at a 17.89% CAGR versus PG at 2.98%.
- Does META or PG pay a bigger dividend?
- META yields 0.35% and PG yields 2.87% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is META or PG more profitable?
- META runs the higher net margin — META at 32.84% versus PG at 19.22%.
- How have META and PG total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, META delivered 17.02% and PG delivered 8.74% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Meta Platforms P/E ratioProcter & Gamble P/E ratioMeta Platforms dividend yieldProcter & Gamble dividend yieldMeta Platforms ROEProcter & Gamble ROEMeta Platforms operating marginProcter & Gamble operating marginMeta Platforms revenue growthProcter & Gamble revenue growthMeta Platforms free cash flowProcter & Gamble free cash flow
Meta Platforms & Procter & Gamble appear in these rankings
Highest Dividend Yield Stocks25+ Year Dividend GrowersFastest Revenue Growth StocksHighest ROE Stocks
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.