Is MET or NU cheaper?

On trailing earnings, MET is cheaper: MET trades at a 16.59 P/E and NU at 19.55.

Which has grown faster, MET or NU?

Over the past five years, NU grew revenue faster — MET at a 3.40% CAGR versus NU at 98.88%.

Does MET or NU pay a bigger dividend?

MET pays a dividend (2.68% yield) while NU does not currently pay one.

Is MET or NU more profitable?

NU runs the higher net margin — MET at 4.70% versus NU at 18.15%.

MetLife, Inc. (MET) vs Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU)

NU leads on 6 of 10 compared metrics, though MET is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of MetLife, Inc. and Nu Holdings Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 19, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

MET

MetLife, Inc.

$55.07B

$85.58Financial Services

Nu Holdings Ltd.

$61.56B

$12.71Financial Services

Total return — MET vs NU

growth of $100 · last 5y

MET +41.2%NU +23.0%MET compounded faster

MET NU

MET vs NU: by the numbers

•NU is the larger company ($61.56B vs $55.07B market cap).
•MET trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.59 vs 19.55 P/E).
•NU converts more revenue to profit (18.15% vs 4.70% net margin).
•NU grew revenue faster over the past five years (98.88% vs 3.40% CAGR).
•MET pays a dividend (2.68% yield) while NU does not currently pay one.

Which is better, MET or NU?

Metric tally: MET 4 · NU 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueMET(lower P/E)

GrowthNU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityNU(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MET	NU
P/E ratio	16.59●	19.55
Forward P/E	8.63●	15.03
P/S ratio	0.73●	3.56
P/B ratio	2.05●	4.96
PEG ratio	—	0.64

Profitability

Metric	MET	NU
Gross margin	28.40%	43.74%●
Operating margin	6.26%	22.96%●
Net margin	4.70%	18.15%●
ROE	13.24%	25.29%●
ROIC	0.72%	16.31%●

Dividends

Metric	MET	NU
Dividend yield	2.68%	—
Payout ratio	47.81%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MET	NU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.40%	98.88%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-3.45%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.31%	—

Frequently asked

Which is better, MET or NU?: It depends on your goal. value: MET (lower P/E); growth: NU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: NU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NU leads 6 to 4.
Is MET or NU cheaper?: On trailing earnings, MET is cheaper: MET trades at a 16.59 P/E and NU at 19.55.
Which has grown faster, MET or NU?: Over the past five years, NU grew revenue faster — MET at a 3.40% CAGR versus NU at 98.88%.
Does MET or NU pay a bigger dividend?: MET pays a dividend (2.68% yield) while NU does not currently pay one.
Is MET or NU more profitable?: NU runs the higher net margin — MET at 4.70% versus NU at 18.15%.

Go deeper

Full MET analysis Full NU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

MetLife P/E ratio Nu P/E ratio MetLife dividend yield Nu dividend yield MetLife ROE Nu ROE MetLife operating margin Nu operating margin MetLife revenue growth Nu revenue growth MetLife free cash flow Nu free cash flow

MetLife & Nu appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 19, 2026.