Mastercard Incorporated (MA) vs The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW)
A side-by-side comparison of Mastercard Incorporated and The Sherwin-Williams Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: MA is classified in Financial Services; SHW is classified in Basic Materials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
$569.19Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
$323.31Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — MA vs SHW
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMA +520.3% (+20.0%/yr)SHW +271.5% (+14.0%/yr)MA compounded faster over this window
MA SHW
MA vs SHW: by the numbers
- •MA is the larger company ($499.20B vs $78.49B market cap).
- •SHW trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (29.80 vs 31.31 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MA converts more revenue to profit (46.34% vs 11.01% net margin).
- •MA grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.09% vs 4.44% CAGR).
- •SHW pays the higher dividend yield (0.99% vs 0.60%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MA | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 31.31 | 29.80 |
| Forward P/E | 28.52 | 26.70 |
| P/S ratio | 14.23 | 3.22 |
| P/B ratio | 88.97 | 20.36 |
| EV / EBITDA | N/A | 19.95 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 4.09% |
Profitability
| Metric | MA | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 100.00% | 49.07% |
| Operating margin | 59.84% | 16.36% |
| Net margin | 46.34% | 11.01% |
| ROE | 289.73% | 69.74% |
| ROIC | N/A | 14.59% |
Dividends
| Metric | MA | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.60% | 0.99% |
| Payout ratio | 18.54% | 29.40% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MA | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.09% | 4.44% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 20.93% | 6.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -0.06% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.88% | 2.45% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, MA or SHW?
- SHW has the lower trailing P/E: MA trades at 31.31 and SHW at 29.80. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, MA or SHW?
- Over the past five years, MA grew revenue faster — MA at a 16.09% CAGR versus SHW at 4.44%.
- Does MA or SHW pay a bigger dividend?
- MA yields 0.60% and SHW yields 0.99% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MA or SHW more profitable?
- MA runs the higher net margin — MA at 46.34% versus SHW at 11.01%.
- How have MA and SHW total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, MA delivered 19.83% and SHW delivered 14.41% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Mastercard P/E ratioSherwin-Williams P/E ratioMastercard dividend yieldSherwin-Williams dividend yieldMastercard ROESherwin-Williams ROEMastercard operating marginSherwin-Williams operating marginMastercard revenue growthSherwin-Williams revenue growthSherwin-Williams free cash flow
Mastercard & Sherwin-Williams appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.