Mastercard Incorporated (MA) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)
NVDA leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics, though MA is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Mastercard Incorporated and NVIDIA Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
$489.98Financial Services
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
$205.19Technology
Total return — MA vs NVDA
growth of $100 · last 20yMA +10551.7%NVDA +51368.6%NVDA compounded faster
MA NVDA
MA vs NVDA: by the numbers
- •NVDA is the larger company ($4.97T vs $432.94B market cap).
- •MA trades at the lower earnings multiple (28.36 vs 31.42 P/E).
- •NVDA converts more revenue to profit (62.97% vs 45.88% net margin).
- •NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.23% vs 17.05% CAGR).
- •MA pays the higher dividend yield (0.67% vs 0.01%).
Which is better, MA or NVDA?
Metric tally: MA 5 · NVDA 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMA(lower P/E)
GrowthNVDA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMA(higher dividend yield)
QualityNVDA(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MA | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 28.36● | 31.42 |
| Forward P/E | 21.48 | 16.44● |
| P/S ratio | 12.89● | 19.74 |
| P/B ratio | 65.09 | 25.60● |
| PEG ratio | 1.81 | 0.57● |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 25.96 |
| FCF yield | — | 2.38% |
Profitability
| Metric | MA | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 82.96%● | 74.15% |
| Operating margin | 59.40% | 64.02%● |
| Net margin | 45.88% | 62.97%● |
| ROE | 231.63%● | 81.65% |
| ROIC | 48.63% | 62.88%● |
Dividends
| Metric | MA | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.67%● | 0.01% |
| Payout ratio | 19.70% | 0.61% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MA | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 17.05% | 68.23%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 20.93% | 85.78%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | 85.52% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.65% | 63.05%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MA or NVDA?
- It depends on your goal. value: MA (lower P/E); growth: NVDA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MA (higher dividend yield); quality: NVDA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NVDA leads 9 to 5.
- Is MA or NVDA cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MA is cheaper: MA trades at a 28.36 P/E and NVDA at 31.42.
- Which has grown faster, MA or NVDA?
- Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — MA at a 17.05% CAGR versus NVDA at 68.23%.
- Does MA or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?
- MA yields 0.67% and NVDA yields 0.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MA or NVDA more profitable?
- NVDA runs the higher net margin — MA at 45.88% versus NVDA at 62.97%.
- Which has been the better investment, MA or NVDA?
- Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — MA at 18.49% versus NVDA at 68.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Mastercard P/E ratioNVIDIA P/E ratioMastercard dividend yieldNVIDIA dividend yieldMastercard ROENVIDIA ROEMastercard operating marginNVIDIA operating marginMastercard revenue growthNVIDIA revenue growthMastercard free cash flowNVIDIA free cash flow
Mastercard & NVIDIA appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.