Which has grown faster, LU or WFC?

Over the past five years, WFC grew revenue faster — LU at a -6.44% CAGR versus WFC at 9.46%.

Does LU or WFC pay a bigger dividend?

WFC pays a dividend (2.15% yield) while LU does not currently pay one.

Is LU or WFC more profitable?

WFC runs the higher net margin — LU at -10.59% versus WFC at 17.29%.

Which has been the better investment, LU or WFC?

Over the past 5-year, WFC delivered the higher annualized total return — LU at -40.92% versus WFC at 8.62%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) vs Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)

WFC leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Lufax Holding Ltd and Wells Fargo & Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Lufax Holding Ltd

$558M

$1.33Financial Services

WFC

Wells Fargo & Company

$256.26B

$83.74Financial Services

Total return — LU vs WFC

growth of $100 · last 6y

LU -97.4%WFC +290.4%WFC compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

LU WFC

LU vs WFC: by the numbers

•WFC is the larger company ($256.26B vs $558M market cap).
•WFC is profitable (17.29% net margin) while LU runs a net loss (-10.59%).
•WFC grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.46% vs -6.44% CAGR).
•WFC pays a dividend (2.15% yield) while LU does not currently pay one.

Which is better, LU or WFC?

Metric tally: LU 4 · WFC 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthWFC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityWFC(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	LU	WFC
P/E ratio	—	12.82
Forward P/E	—	11.96
P/S ratio	0.09●	2.14
P/B ratio	0.05●	1.51
PEG ratio	—	0.79
EV / EBITDA	72.98	17.27●
FCF yield	312.50%●	0.44%

Profitability

Metric	LU	WFC
Gross margin	41.96%	64.55%●
Operating margin	-4.31%	20.47%●
Net margin	-10.59%	17.29%●
ROE	-4.14%	12.18%●
ROIC	-0.21%	3.16%●

Dividends

Metric	LU	WFC
Dividend yield	—	2.15%
Payout ratio	—	28.17%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LU	WFC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-6.44%	9.46%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-43.16%	72.38%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	24.09%●	-10.02%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-40.92%	15.64%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, LU or WFC?: It depends on your goal. growth: WFC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: WFC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WFC leads 9 to 4.
Which has grown faster, LU or WFC?: Over the past five years, WFC grew revenue faster — LU at a -6.44% CAGR versus WFC at 9.46%.
Does LU or WFC pay a bigger dividend?: WFC pays a dividend (2.15% yield) while LU does not currently pay one.
Is LU or WFC more profitable?: WFC runs the higher net margin — LU at -10.59% versus WFC at 17.29%.
Which has been the better investment, LU or WFC?: Over the past 5-year, WFC delivered the higher annualized total return — LU at -40.92% versus WFC at 8.62%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LU analysis Full WFC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lufax P/E ratio Wells Fargo & P/E ratio Lufax dividend yield Wells Fargo & dividend yield Lufax ROE Wells Fargo & ROE Lufax operating margin Wells Fargo & operating margin Lufax revenue growth Wells Fargo & revenue growth Lufax free cash flow Wells Fargo & free cash flow

Lufax & Wells Fargo & appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks Largest Companies by Market Cap

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.