Which has grown faster, LU or NMS?

Neither grew: over the past five years both shrank revenue, with NMS's decline the smaller — LU at a -13.35% CAGR versus NMS at -8.12%.

Does LU or NMS pay a bigger dividend?

NMS pays a dividend (7.56% yield), while LU is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is LU or NMS more profitable?

NMS runs the higher net margin — LU at -7.83% versus NMS at 130.68%.

How have LU and NMS total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, LU delivered -37.01% and NMS delivered -2.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) vs Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS)

A side-by-side comparison of Lufax Holding Ltd and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Lufax Holding Ltd

$1.05B

$1.21Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

NMS

Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund

$67M

$10.51Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Total return — LU vs NMS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

LU -93.8% (-37.1%/yr)NMS -3.3% (-0.6%/yr)NMS compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

LU NMS

LU vs NMS: by the numbers

•LU is the larger company ($1.05B vs $67M market cap).
•NMS is profitable (130.68% net margin) while LU runs a net loss (-7.83%).
•Both shrank revenue over the past five years; NMS's decline was smaller (-8.12% vs -13.35% CAGR).
•NMS pays a dividend (7.56% yield), while LU is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LU	NMS
P/S ratio	0.26	N/A
P/B ratio	0.09	0.89

Profitability

Metric	LU	NMS
Gross margin	74.93%	85.04%
Operating margin	1.13%	162.66%
Net margin	-7.83%	130.68%
ROE	-2.75%	9.39%

Dividends

Metric	LU	NMS
Dividend yield	N/A	7.56%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LU	NMS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-13.35%	-8.12%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-43.16%	-3.96%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-37.01%	-2.98%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, LU or NMS?: Neither grew: over the past five years both shrank revenue, with NMS's decline the smaller — LU at a -13.35% CAGR versus NMS at -8.12%.
Does LU or NMS pay a bigger dividend?: NMS pays a dividend (7.56% yield), while LU is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is LU or NMS more profitable?: NMS runs the higher net margin — LU at -7.83% versus NMS at 130.68%.
How have LU and NMS total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, LU delivered -37.01% and NMS delivered -2.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LU analysis Full NMS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund dividend yield Lufax ROE Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund ROE Lufax operating margin Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund operating margin Lufax revenue growth Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund revenue growth

Lufax & Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.