Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) vs Nano Labs Ltd (NA)

A side-by-side comparison of Lufax Holding Ltd and Nano Labs Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: LU is classified in Financial Services; NA is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnLU vs NA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4y
LU -82.7%NA -98.4%LU compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
110100Start $1002023202420252026$17$2
LU NA

LU vs NA: by the numbers

  • LU is the larger company ($646M vs $119M market cap).
  • NA is profitable (505.49% net margin) while LU runs a net loss (-11.38%).
  • NA grew revenue faster over the past five years (64.16% vs -12.94% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricLUNA
P/E ratioN/A2.30
P/S ratio0.1711.40
P/B ratio0.060.41
EV / EBITDAN/A6.44

Profitability

MetricLUNA
Gross margin74.93%-147.33%
Operating margin0.57%-396.84%
Net margin-11.38%505.49%
ROE-3.70%17.96%
ROIC-0.21%-10.96%

Growth (annualized)

MetricLUNA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)-12.94%64.16%
EPS CAGR (5Y)-43.16%N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)-33.54%N/A

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, LU or NA?
Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — LU at a -12.94% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.
Is LU or NA more profitable?
NA runs the higher net margin — LU at -11.38% versus NA at 505.49%.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.