Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) vs Studio City International Holdings Limited (MSC)

A side-by-side comparison of Lufax Holding Ltd and Studio City International Holdings Limited across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: LU is classified in Financial Services; MSC is classified in Consumer Cyclical. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnLU vs MSC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y
LU -92.5%MSC -88.7%MSC compounded faster
050100150Start $100202120222023202420252026$7$11
LU MSC

LU vs MSC: by the numbers

  • LU is the larger company ($646M vs $85M market cap).
  • Both run net losses; MSC's is the smaller (-5.63% vs -11.38% net margin).
  • MSC grew revenue faster over the past five years (77.20% vs -12.94% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricLUMSC
P/S ratio0.170.12
P/B ratio0.060.17
EV / EBITDAN/A6.89
FCF yieldN/A43.29%

Profitability

MetricLUMSC
Gross margin74.93%68.05%
Operating margin0.57%11.60%
Net margin-11.38%-5.63%
ROE-3.70%-7.94%
ROIC-0.21%2.68%

Growth (annualized)

MetricLUMSC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)-12.94%77.20%
EPS CAGR (5Y)-43.16%N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)-33.54%-29.08%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, LU or MSC?
Over the past five years, MSC grew revenue faster — LU at a -12.94% CAGR versus MSC at 77.20%.
How have LU and MSC total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, LU delivered -33.54% and MSC delivered -29.08% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.