Which has grown faster, LU or MHK?

Over the past five years, MHK grew revenue faster — LU at a -6.44% CAGR versus MHK at 2.03%.

Is LU or MHK more profitable?

MHK runs the higher net margin — LU at -10.59% versus MHK at 3.77%.

Which has been the better investment, LU or MHK?

Over the past 5-year, MHK delivered the higher annualized total return — LU at -40.92% versus MHK at -5.78%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) vs Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK)

MHK leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Lufax Holding Ltd and Mohawk Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Lufax Holding Ltd

$558M

$1.33Financial Services

MHK

Mohawk Industries, Inc.

$6.56B

$107.64Consumer Cyclical

Total return — LU vs MHK

growth of $100 · last 6y

LU -97.4%MHK +4.3%MHK compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

LU MHK

LU vs MHK: by the numbers

•MHK is the larger company ($6.56B vs $558M market cap).
•MHK is profitable (3.77% net margin) while LU runs a net loss (-10.59%).
•MHK grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.03% vs -6.44% CAGR).

Which is better, LU or MHK?

Metric tally: LU 5 · MHK 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthMHK(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityMHK(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	LU	MHK
P/E ratio	—	16.14
Forward P/E	—	12.54
P/S ratio	0.09●	0.60
P/B ratio	0.05●	0.79
EV / EBITDA	72.98	5.54●
FCF yield	312.50%●	10.68%

Profitability

Metric	LU	MHK
Gross margin	41.96%●	24.34%
Operating margin	-4.31%	4.89%●
Net margin	-10.59%	3.77%●
ROE	-4.14%	4.95%●
ROIC	-0.21%	3.54%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LU	MHK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-6.44%	2.03%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-43.16%	-3.82%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	24.09%●	-12.83%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-40.92%	-11.03%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, LU or MHK?: It depends on your goal. growth: MHK (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MHK (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MHK leads 8 to 5.
Which has grown faster, LU or MHK?: Over the past five years, MHK grew revenue faster — LU at a -6.44% CAGR versus MHK at 2.03%.
Is LU or MHK more profitable?: MHK runs the higher net margin — LU at -10.59% versus MHK at 3.77%.
Which has been the better investment, LU or MHK?: Over the past 5-year, MHK delivered the higher annualized total return — LU at -40.92% versus MHK at -5.78%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LU analysis Full MHK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lufax P/E ratio Mohawk Industries P/E ratio Lufax dividend yield Mohawk Industries dividend yield Lufax ROE Mohawk Industries ROE Lufax operating margin Mohawk Industries operating margin Lufax revenue growth Mohawk Industries revenue growth Lufax free cash flow Mohawk Industries free cash flow

Lufax & Mohawk Industries appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.