Lennar Corporation (LEN) vs Lufax Holding Ltd (LU)
A side-by-side comparison of Lennar Corporation and Lufax Holding Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: LEN is classified in Consumer Cyclical; LU is classified in Financial Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
LEN
Lennar Corporation
$87.65Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
LU
Lufax Holding Ltd
$1.54Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — LEN vs LU
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6yLEN +32.0%LU -92.5%LEN compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
LEN LU
LEN vs LU: by the numbers
- •LEN is the larger company ($21.76B vs $646M market cap).
- •LEN is profitable (4.94% net margin) while LU runs a net loss (-11.38%).
- •LEN grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.01% vs -12.94% CAGR).
- •LEN pays a dividend (2.35% yield), while LU is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LEN | LU |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.31 | N/A |
| Forward P/E | 15.45 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 0.63 | 0.17 |
| P/B ratio | 0.95 | 0.06 |
| PEG ratio | 53.23 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.07 | N/A |
| FCF yield | 3.98% | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | LEN | LU |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 7.95% | 74.93% |
| Operating margin | 6.02% | 0.57% |
| Net margin | 4.94% | -11.38% |
| ROE | 7.49% | -3.70% |
| ROIC | 6.62% | -0.21% |
Dividends
| Metric | LEN | LU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.35% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 25.06% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LEN | LU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.01% | -12.94% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.25% | -43.16% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -25.28% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.12% | -33.54% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, LEN or LU?
- Over the past five years, LEN grew revenue faster — LEN at a 6.01% CAGR versus LU at -12.94%.
- Does LEN or LU pay a bigger dividend?
- LEN pays a dividend (2.35% yield), while LU is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is LEN or LU more profitable?
- LEN runs the higher net margin — LEN at 4.94% versus LU at -11.38%.
- How have LEN and LU total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, LEN delivered 6.88% and LU delivered -33.54% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lennar P/E ratioLufax P/E ratioLennar dividend yieldLufax dividend yieldLennar ROELufax ROELennar operating marginLufax operating marginLennar revenue growthLufax revenue growthLennar free cash flowLufax free cash flow
Lennar & Lufax appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.