Isabella Bank Corporation (ISBA) vs Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS)
ISBA leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics, though NMS is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Isabella Bank Corporation and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ISBA
Isabella Bank Corporation
$40.15Financial Services
NMS
Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund
$12.00Financial Services
Total return — ISBA vs NMS
growth of $100 · last 12yISBA +69.1%NMS -20.0%ISBA compounded faster
ISBA NMS
ISBA vs NMS: by the numbers
- •ISBA is the larger company ($294M vs $75M market cap).
- •NMS trades at the lower earnings multiple (11.21 vs 14.82 P/E).
- •NMS converts more revenue to profit (87.52% vs 17.23% net margin).
- •ISBA grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.06% vs -7.24% CAGR).
- •NMS pays the higher dividend yield (6.30% vs 2.79%).
Which is better, ISBA or NMS?
Metric tally: ISBA 8 · NMS 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNMS(lower P/E)
GrowthISBA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeNMS(higher dividend yield)
QualityISBA(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ISBA | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.82 | 11.21● |
| Forward P/E | 11.31 | — |
| P/S ratio | 2.54● | 9.91 |
| P/B ratio | 1.26 | 1.00● |
| PEG ratio | 0.52● | 2.28 |
Profitability
| Metric | ISBA | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 71.36%● | -4.36% |
| Operating margin | 20.07%● | -12.54% |
| Net margin | 17.23% | 87.52%● |
| ROE | 8.53% | 8.85%● |
| ROIC | 4.45%● | -0.21% |
Dividends
| Metric | ISBA | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.79% | 6.30%● |
| Payout ratio | 43.75% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ISBA | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.06%● | -7.24% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 13.32%● | -22.02% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 16.07%● | -0.65% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ISBA or NMS?
- It depends on your goal. value: NMS (lower P/E); growth: ISBA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: NMS (higher dividend yield); quality: ISBA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ISBA leads 8 to 5.
- Is ISBA or NMS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NMS is cheaper: ISBA trades at a 14.82 P/E and NMS at 11.21.
- Which has grown faster, ISBA or NMS?
- Over the past five years, ISBA grew revenue faster — ISBA at a 9.06% CAGR versus NMS at -7.24%.
- Does ISBA or NMS pay a bigger dividend?
- ISBA yields 2.79% and NMS yields 6.30% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ISBA or NMS more profitable?
- NMS runs the higher net margin — ISBA at 17.23% versus NMS at 87.52%.
- Which has been the better investment, ISBA or NMS?
- Over the past 10-year, ISBA delivered the higher annualized total return — ISBA at 8.50% versus NMS at 1.71%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Isabella Bank P/E ratioNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund P/E ratioIsabella Bank dividend yieldNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund dividend yieldIsabella Bank ROENuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund ROEIsabella Bank operating marginNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund operating marginIsabella Bank revenue growthNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund revenue growthIsabella Bank free cash flowNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund free cash flow
Isabella Bank & Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.