Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) vs J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT)
JBHT leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Ingersoll Rand Inc. and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
$77.05Industrials
JBHT
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
$282.61Industrials
Total return — IR vs JBHT
growth of $100 · last 9yIR +263.6%JBHT +221.2%IR compounded faster
IR JBHT
IR vs JBHT: by the numbers
- •IR is the larger company ($30.15B vs $26.65B market cap).
- •JBHT trades at the lower earnings multiple (42.79 vs 51.83 P/E).
- •IR converts more revenue to profit (7.54% vs 5.13% net margin).
- •IR grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.25% vs 4.00% CAGR).
- •JBHT pays the higher dividend yield (0.65% vs 0.10%).
Which is better, IR or JBHT?
Metric tally: IR 7 · JBHT 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueJBHT(lower P/E)
GrowthIR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeJBHT(higher dividend yield)
QualityJBHT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | IR | JBHT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 51.83 | 42.79● |
| Forward P/E | 21.88● | 37.37 |
| P/S ratio | 3.86 | 2.17● |
| P/B ratio | 2.96● | 7.32 |
| PEG ratio | 4.71 | 3.42● |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.73 | 17.17● |
| FCF yield | 3.86% | 3.92% |
Profitability
| Metric | IR | JBHT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 38.24%● | 17.28% |
| Operating margin | 18.06%● | 7.36% |
| Net margin | 7.54%● | 5.13% |
| ROE | 5.77% | 17.31%● |
| ROIC | 6.34% | 9.32%● |
Dividends
| Metric | IR | JBHT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.10% | 0.65%● |
| Payout ratio | 5.48% | 29.41% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | IR | JBHT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 10.25%● | 4.00% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.01%● | 5.02% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.93% | 13.09%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 9.84% | 12.27%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, IR or JBHT?
- It depends on your goal. value: JBHT (lower P/E); growth: IR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: JBHT (higher dividend yield); quality: JBHT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, JBHT leads 9 to 7.
- Is IR or JBHT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, JBHT is cheaper: IR trades at a 51.83 P/E and JBHT at 42.79.
- Which has grown faster, IR or JBHT?
- Over the past five years, IR grew revenue faster — IR at a 10.25% CAGR versus JBHT at 4.00%.
- Does IR or JBHT pay a bigger dividend?
- IR yields 0.10% and JBHT yields 0.65% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is IR or JBHT more profitable?
- IR runs the higher net margin — IR at 7.54% versus JBHT at 5.13%.
- Which has been the better investment, IR or JBHT?
- Over the past 5-year, JBHT delivered the higher annualized total return — IR at 9.84% versus JBHT at 13.56%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Ingersoll Rand P/E ratioJ.B. Hunt Transport Services P/E ratioIngersoll Rand dividend yieldJ.B. Hunt Transport Services dividend yieldIngersoll Rand ROEJ.B. Hunt Transport Services ROEIngersoll Rand operating marginJ.B. Hunt Transport Services operating marginIngersoll Rand revenue growthJ.B. Hunt Transport Services revenue growthIngersoll Rand free cash flowJ.B. Hunt Transport Services free cash flow
Ingersoll Rand & J.B. Hunt Transport Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.