Humana Inc. (HUM) vs Meta Platforms, Inc. (META)
A side-by-side comparison of Humana Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: HUM is classified in Healthcare; META is classified in Communication Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
HUM
Humana Inc.
$388.71HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:01 PM EDT
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
$593.41Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — HUM vs META
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 14yHUM +455.5%META +1474.4%META compounded faster
HUM META
HUM vs META: by the numbers
- •META is the larger company ($1.51T vs $46.67B market cap).
- •META trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (21.60 vs 40.76 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •META converts more revenue to profit (32.84% vs 0.82% net margin).
- •META grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.89% vs 11.71% CAGR).
- •HUM pays the higher dividend yield (0.70% vs 0.35%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | HUM | META |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.76 | 21.60 |
| Forward P/E | 42.42 | 18.03 |
| P/S ratio | 0.34 | 7.08 |
| P/B ratio | 2.48 | 6.25 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 1.16 |
| EV / EBITDA | 25.16 | 14.51 |
| FCF yield | 2.77% | 3.17% |
Profitability
| Metric | HUM | META |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 14.01% | 81.94% |
| Operating margin | 1.01% | 41.21% |
| Net margin | 0.82% | 32.84% |
| ROE | 6.08% | 28.97% |
| ROIC | 3.12% | 17.95% |
Dividends
| Metric | HUM | META |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.70% | 0.35% |
| Payout ratio | 26.90% | 8.76% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | HUM | META |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 11.71% | 17.89% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -17.27% | 18.60% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -17.19% | 14.84% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -1.91% | 10.03% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, HUM or META?
- META has the lower trailing P/E: HUM trades at 40.76 and META at 21.60. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, HUM or META?
- Over the past five years, META grew revenue faster — HUM at a 11.71% CAGR versus META at 17.89%.
- Does HUM or META pay a bigger dividend?
- HUM yields 0.70% and META yields 0.35% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is HUM or META more profitable?
- META runs the higher net margin — HUM at 0.82% versus META at 32.84%.
- How have HUM and META total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, HUM delivered 9.18% and META delivered 17.02% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Humana P/E ratioMeta Platforms P/E ratioHumana dividend yieldMeta Platforms dividend yieldHumana ROEMeta Platforms ROEHumana operating marginMeta Platforms operating marginHumana revenue growthMeta Platforms revenue growthHumana free cash flowMeta Platforms free cash flow
Humana & Meta Platforms appear in these rankings
Fastest Revenue Growth StocksHighest ROE StocksHighest Operating Margin StocksHighest 10-Year Total Return Stocks
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.