Which has the lower trailing P/E, HUM or PINS?

HUM has the lower trailing P/E: HUM trades at 40.76 and PINS at 49.35. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, HUM or PINS?

Over the past five years, PINS grew revenue faster — HUM at a 11.71% CAGR versus PINS at 18.08%.

Does HUM or PINS pay a bigger dividend?

HUM pays a dividend (0.70% yield), while PINS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is HUM or PINS more profitable?

PINS runs the higher net margin — HUM at 0.82% versus PINS at 7.64%.

How have HUM and PINS total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, HUM delivered 9.18% and PINS delivered -20.56% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Humana Inc. (HUM) vs Pinterest, Inc. (PINS)

A side-by-side comparison of Humana Inc. and Pinterest, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: HUM is classified in Healthcare; PINS is classified in Communication Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

HUM

Humana Inc.

$46.67B

$388.71HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:01 PM EDT

PINS

Pinterest, Inc.

$16.18B

$24.34Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Total return — HUM vs PINS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7y

HUM +51.4%PINS -3.7%HUM compounded faster

HUM PINS

HUM vs PINS: by the numbers

•HUM is the larger company ($46.67B vs $16.18B market cap).
•HUM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (40.76 vs 49.35 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PINS converts more revenue to profit (7.64% vs 0.82% net margin).
•PINS grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.08% vs 11.71% CAGR).
•HUM pays a dividend (0.70% yield), while PINS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HUM	PINS
P/E ratio	40.76	49.35
Forward P/E	42.42	12.39
P/S ratio	0.34	3.42
P/B ratio	2.48	5.25
EV / EBITDA	25.16	45.07
FCF yield	2.77%	8.07%

Profitability

Metric	HUM	PINS
Gross margin	14.01%	79.86%
Operating margin	1.01%	7.36%
Net margin	0.82%	7.64%
ROE	6.08%	11.73%
ROIC	3.12%	5.88%

Dividends

Metric	HUM	PINS
Dividend yield	0.70%	N/A
Payout ratio	26.90%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HUM	PINS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	11.71%	18.08%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-17.27%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-17.19%	39.27%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-1.91%	-20.56%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, HUM or PINS?: HUM has the lower trailing P/E: HUM trades at 40.76 and PINS at 49.35. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, HUM or PINS?: Over the past five years, PINS grew revenue faster — HUM at a 11.71% CAGR versus PINS at 18.08%.
Does HUM or PINS pay a bigger dividend?: HUM pays a dividend (0.70% yield), while PINS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is HUM or PINS more profitable?: PINS runs the higher net margin — HUM at 0.82% versus PINS at 7.64%.
How have HUM and PINS total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, HUM delivered 9.18% and PINS delivered -20.56% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HUM analysis Full PINS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Humana P/E ratio Pinterest P/E ratio Humana dividend yield Pinterest dividend yield Humana ROE Pinterest ROE Humana operating margin Pinterest operating margin Humana revenue growth Pinterest revenue growth Humana free cash flow Pinterest free cash flow

Humana & Pinterest appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.