Which has grown faster, GF or LU?

Over the past five years, GF grew revenue faster — GF at a -3.04% CAGR versus LU at -6.44%.

Does GF or LU pay a bigger dividend?

GF pays a dividend (2.44% yield) while LU does not currently pay one.

Is GF or LU more profitable?

GF runs the higher net margin — GF at 286.83% versus LU at -10.59%.

Which has been the better investment, GF or LU?

Over the past 5-year, GF delivered the higher annualized total return — GF at 6.01% versus LU at -41.90%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The New Germany Fund, Inc. (GF) vs Lufax Holding Ltd (LU)

GF leads on 7 of 10 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of The New Germany Fund, Inc. and Lufax Holding Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

The New Germany Fund, Inc.

$189M

$11.65Financial Services

Lufax Holding Ltd

$516M

$1.23Financial Services

Total return — GF vs LU

growth of $100 · last 6y

GF -27.9%LU -97.6%GF compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

GF LU

GF vs LU: by the numbers

•LU is the larger company ($516M vs $189M market cap).
•GF is profitable (286.83% net margin) while LU runs a net loss (-10.59%).
•GF grew revenue faster over the past five years (-3.04% vs -6.44% CAGR).
•GF pays a dividend (2.44% yield) while LU does not currently pay one.

Which is better, GF or LU?

Metric tally: GF 7 · LU 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthGF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityGF(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GF	LU
P/E ratio	5.32	—
Forward P/E	5.14	—
P/S ratio	15.30	0.08●
P/B ratio	0.92	0.05●
PEG ratio	0.02	—

Profitability

Metric	GF	LU
Gross margin	85.03%●	41.96%
Operating margin	-98.27%	-4.31%●
Net margin	286.83%●	-10.59%
ROE	17.19%●	-4.14%
ROIC	26.89%●	-0.21%

Dividends

Metric	GF	LU
Dividend yield	2.44%	—
Payout ratio	8.27%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GF	LU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-3.04%●	-6.44%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-11.39%●	-43.16%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-8.37%●	-41.90%

Frequently asked

Which is better, GF or LU?: It depends on your goal. growth: GF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: GF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GF leads 7 to 3.
Which has grown faster, GF or LU?: Over the past five years, GF grew revenue faster — GF at a -3.04% CAGR versus LU at -6.44%.
Does GF or LU pay a bigger dividend?: GF pays a dividend (2.44% yield) while LU does not currently pay one.
Is GF or LU more profitable?: GF runs the higher net margin — GF at 286.83% versus LU at -10.59%.
Which has been the better investment, GF or LU?: Over the past 5-year, GF delivered the higher annualized total return — GF at 6.01% versus LU at -41.90%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GF analysis Full LU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

New Germany Fund P/E ratio Lufax P/E ratio New Germany Fund dividend yield Lufax dividend yield New Germany Fund ROE Lufax ROE New Germany Fund operating margin Lufax operating margin New Germany Fund revenue growth Lufax revenue growth New Germany Fund free cash flow Lufax free cash flow

New Germany Fund & Lufax appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.