Which has grown faster, FT or LU?

Over the past five years, FT grew revenue faster — FT at a 0.42% CAGR versus LU at -12.44%.

Does FT or LU pay a bigger dividend?

FT pays a dividend (5.98% yield), while LU is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is FT or LU more profitable?

FT runs the higher net margin — FT at 100.92% versus LU at -10.59%.

How have FT and LU total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, FT delivered 7.89% and LU delivered -35.87% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Franklin Universal Trust (FT) vs Lufax Holding Ltd (LU)

A side-by-side comparison of Franklin Universal Trust and Lufax Holding Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 23, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Franklin Universal Trust

$197M

$7.82Financial ServicesAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Lufax Holding Ltd

$1.20B

$1.39Financial ServicesAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — FT vs LU

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

FT +70.4% (+9.3%/yr)LU -92.9% (-35.6%/yr)FT compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

FT LU

FT vs LU: by the numbers

•LU is the larger company ($1.20B vs $197M market cap).
•FT is profitable (100.92% net margin) while LU runs a net loss (-10.59%).
•FT grew revenue faster over the past five years (0.42% vs -12.44% CAGR).
•FT pays a dividend (5.98% yield), while LU is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FT	LU
P/E ratio	2.92	N/A
P/S ratio	5.26	0.16
P/B ratio	0.86	0.05

Profitability

Metric	FT	LU
Gross margin	87.35%	74.93%
Operating margin	119.92%	-4.31%
Net margin	100.92%	-10.59%
ROE	9.04%	-4.14%

Dividends

Metric	FT	LU
Dividend yield	5.98%	N/A
Payout ratio	61.51%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FT	LU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	0.42%	-12.44%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-43.16%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	5.69%	-35.87%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, FT or LU?: Over the past five years, FT grew revenue faster — FT at a 0.42% CAGR versus LU at -12.44%.
Does FT or LU pay a bigger dividend?: FT pays a dividend (5.98% yield), while LU is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is FT or LU more profitable?: FT runs the higher net margin — FT at 100.92% versus LU at -10.59%.
How have FT and LU total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, FT delivered 7.89% and LU delivered -35.87% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FT analysis Full LU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Franklin Universal P/E ratio Franklin Universal dividend yield Franklin Universal ROE Lufax ROE Franklin Universal operating margin Lufax operating margin Franklin Universal revenue growth Lufax revenue growth

Franklin Universal & Lufax appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 23, 2026.