Which has grown faster, FT or LU?

Over the past five years, FT grew revenue faster — FT at a 3.92% CAGR versus LU at -6.44%.

Does FT or LU pay a bigger dividend?

FT pays a dividend (6.38% yield) while LU does not currently pay one.

Is FT or LU more profitable?

FT runs the higher net margin — FT at 179.50% versus LU at -10.59%.

Which has been the better investment, FT or LU?

Over the past 5-year, FT delivered the higher annualized total return — FT at 8.35% versus LU at -41.52%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Franklin Universal Trust (FT) vs Lufax Holding Ltd (LU)

FT leads on 8 of 10 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Franklin Universal Trust and Lufax Holding Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Franklin Universal Trust

$201M

$7.99Financial Services

Lufax Holding Ltd

$532M

$1.27Financial Services

Total return — FT vs LU

growth of $100 · last 6y

FT +18.1%LU -97.5%FT compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

FT LU

FT vs LU: by the numbers

•LU is the larger company ($532M vs $201M market cap).
•FT is profitable (179.50% net margin) while LU runs a net loss (-10.59%).
•FT grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.92% vs -6.44% CAGR).
•FT pays a dividend (6.38% yield) while LU does not currently pay one.

Which is better, FT or LU?

Metric tally: FT 8 · LU 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthFT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityFT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FT	LU
P/E ratio	2.98	—
P/S ratio	5.37	0.08●
P/B ratio	0.88	0.05●

Profitability

Metric	FT	LU
Gross margin	86.88%●	41.96%
Operating margin	198.87%●	-4.31%
Net margin	179.50%●	-10.59%
ROE	29.45%●	-4.14%
ROIC	8.38%●	-0.21%

Dividends

Metric	FT	LU
Dividend yield	6.38%	—
Payout ratio	67.11%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FT	LU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.92%●	-6.44%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-3.82%●	-43.16%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	7.02%●	-41.52%

Frequently asked

Which is better, FT or LU?: It depends on your goal. growth: FT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: FT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FT leads 8 to 2.
Which has grown faster, FT or LU?: Over the past five years, FT grew revenue faster — FT at a 3.92% CAGR versus LU at -6.44%.
Does FT or LU pay a bigger dividend?: FT pays a dividend (6.38% yield) while LU does not currently pay one.
Is FT or LU more profitable?: FT runs the higher net margin — FT at 179.50% versus LU at -10.59%.
Which has been the better investment, FT or LU?: Over the past 5-year, FT delivered the higher annualized total return — FT at 8.35% versus LU at -41.52%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FT analysis Full LU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Franklin Universal P/E ratio Lufax P/E ratio Franklin Universal dividend yield Lufax dividend yield Franklin Universal ROE Lufax ROE Franklin Universal operating margin Lufax operating margin Franklin Universal revenue growth Lufax revenue growth Franklin Universal free cash flow Lufax free cash flow

Franklin Universal & Lufax appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.