Which has grown faster, FT or ISBA?

Over the past five years, ISBA grew revenue faster — FT at a 0.42% CAGR versus ISBA at 7.59%.

Does FT or ISBA pay a bigger dividend?

FT yields 6.77% and ISBA yields 2.85% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is FT or ISBA more profitable?

FT runs the higher net margin — FT at 100.92% versus ISBA at 18.77%.

How have FT and ISBA total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, FT delivered 7.70% and ISBA delivered 8.28% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Franklin Universal Trust (FT) vs Isabella Bank Corporation (ISBA)

A side-by-side comparison of Franklin Universal Trust and Isabella Bank Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Franklin Universal Trust

$184M

$7.31Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

ISBA

Isabella Bank Corporation

$280M

$38.24Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — FT vs ISBA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

FT +106.6% (+7.5%/yr)ISBA +121.7% (+8.3%/yr)ISBA compounded faster over this window

FT ISBA

FT vs ISBA: by the numbers

•ISBA is the larger company ($280M vs $184M market cap).
•FT converts more revenue to profit (100.92% vs 18.77% net margin).
•ISBA grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.59% vs 0.42% CAGR).
•FT pays the higher dividend yield (6.77% vs 2.85%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FT	ISBA
P/E ratio	N/A	14.06
Forward P/E	N/A	11.59
P/S ratio	N/A	2.64
P/B ratio	0.81	1.13

Profitability

Metric	FT	ISBA
Gross margin	87.35%	67.66%
Operating margin	119.92%	19.76%
Net margin	100.92%	18.77%
ROE	9.04%	8.03%

Dividends

Metric	FT	ISBA
Dividend yield	6.77%	2.85%
Payout ratio	N/A	41.18%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FT	ISBA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	0.42%	7.59%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	13.32%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	4.66%	13.75%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, FT or ISBA?: Over the past five years, ISBA grew revenue faster — FT at a 0.42% CAGR versus ISBA at 7.59%.
Does FT or ISBA pay a bigger dividend?: FT yields 6.77% and ISBA yields 2.85% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is FT or ISBA more profitable?: FT runs the higher net margin — FT at 100.92% versus ISBA at 18.77%.
How have FT and ISBA total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, FT delivered 7.70% and ISBA delivered 8.28% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FT analysis Full ISBA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Isabella Bank P/E ratio Franklin Universal dividend yield Isabella Bank dividend yield Franklin Universal ROE Isabella Bank ROE Franklin Universal operating margin Isabella Bank operating margin Franklin Universal revenue growth Isabella Bank revenue growth

Franklin Universal & Isabella Bank appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.