Is FT or ISBA cheaper?

On trailing earnings, FT is cheaper: FT trades at a 2.98 P/E and ISBA at 14.76.

Which has grown faster, FT or ISBA?

Over the past five years, ISBA grew revenue faster — FT at a 3.92% CAGR versus ISBA at 9.06%.

Does FT or ISBA pay a bigger dividend?

FT yields 6.38% and ISBA yields 2.80% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is FT or ISBA more profitable?

FT runs the higher net margin — FT at 179.50% versus ISBA at 17.23%.

Franklin Universal Trust (FT) vs Isabella Bank Corporation (ISBA)

FT leads on 8 of 12 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Franklin Universal Trust and Isabella Bank Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Franklin Universal Trust

$201M

$7.99Financial Services

ISBA

Isabella Bank Corporation

$293M

$39.99Financial Services

Total return — FT vs ISBA

growth of $100 · last 23y

FT +47.8%ISBA +46.8%FT compounded faster

FT ISBA

FT vs ISBA: by the numbers

•ISBA is the larger company ($293M vs $201M market cap).
•FT trades at the lower earnings multiple (2.98 vs 14.76 P/E).
•FT converts more revenue to profit (179.50% vs 17.23% net margin).
•ISBA grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.06% vs 3.92% CAGR).
•FT pays the higher dividend yield (6.38% vs 2.80%).

Which is better, FT or ISBA?

Metric tally: FT 8 · ISBA 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueFT(lower P/E)

GrowthISBA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeFT(higher dividend yield)

QualityFT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FT	ISBA
P/E ratio	2.98●	14.76
Forward P/E	—	11.26
P/S ratio	5.37	2.53●
P/B ratio	0.88●	1.25
PEG ratio	—	0.52

Profitability

Metric	FT	ISBA
Gross margin	86.88%●	71.36%
Operating margin	198.87%●	20.07%
Net margin	179.50%●	17.23%
ROE	29.45%●	8.53%
ROIC	8.38%●	4.45%

Dividends

Metric	FT	ISBA
Dividend yield	6.38%●	2.80%
Payout ratio	67.11%	43.75%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FT	ISBA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.92%	9.06%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-3.82%	13.32%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	7.02%	16.83%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, FT or ISBA?: It depends on your goal. value: FT (lower P/E); growth: ISBA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: FT (higher dividend yield); quality: FT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FT leads 8 to 4.
Is FT or ISBA cheaper?: On trailing earnings, FT is cheaper: FT trades at a 2.98 P/E and ISBA at 14.76.
Which has grown faster, FT or ISBA?: Over the past five years, ISBA grew revenue faster — FT at a 3.92% CAGR versus ISBA at 9.06%.
Does FT or ISBA pay a bigger dividend?: FT yields 6.38% and ISBA yields 2.80% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is FT or ISBA more profitable?: FT runs the higher net margin — FT at 179.50% versus ISBA at 17.23%.

Go deeper

Full FT analysis Full ISBA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Franklin Universal P/E ratio Isabella Bank P/E ratio Franklin Universal dividend yield Isabella Bank dividend yield Franklin Universal ROE Isabella Bank ROE Franklin Universal operating margin Isabella Bank operating margin Franklin Universal revenue growth Isabella Bank revenue growth Franklin Universal free cash flow Isabella Bank free cash flow

Franklin Universal & Isabella Bank appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.