Which has the lower trailing P/E, FT or ISBA?

FT has the lower trailing P/E: FT trades at 2.92 and ISBA at 14.62. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, FT or ISBA?

Over the past five years, ISBA grew revenue faster — FT at a 3.92% CAGR versus ISBA at 7.59%.

Does FT or ISBA pay a bigger dividend?

FT yields 6.51% and ISBA yields 2.82% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is FT or ISBA more profitable?

FT runs the higher net margin — FT at 179.50% versus ISBA at 18.77%.

How have FT and ISBA total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, FT delivered 7.98% and ISBA delivered 8.41% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Franklin Universal Trust (FT) vs Isabella Bank Corporation (ISBA)

A side-by-side comparison of Franklin Universal Trust and Isabella Bank Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 8, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Franklin Universal Trust

$197M

$7.83Financial ServicesAt close: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

ISBA

Isabella Bank Corporation

$292M

$39.77Financial ServicesAt close: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — FT vs ISBA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 23y

FT +594.9%ISBA +207.9%FT compounded faster

FT ISBA

FT vs ISBA: by the numbers

•ISBA is the larger company ($292M vs $197M market cap).
•FT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.92 vs 14.62 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•FT converts more revenue to profit (179.50% vs 18.77% net margin).
•ISBA grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.59% vs 3.92% CAGR).
•FT pays the higher dividend yield (6.51% vs 2.82%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FT	ISBA
P/E ratio	2.92	14.62
Forward P/E	N/A	12.05
P/S ratio	5.27	2.74
P/B ratio	0.86	1.17
PEG ratio	N/A	0.52

Profitability

Metric	FT	ISBA
Gross margin	86.88%	67.66%
Operating margin	119.92%	19.76%
Net margin	179.50%	18.77%
ROE	29.45%	8.03%
ROIC	8.38%	4.45%

Dividends

Metric	FT	ISBA
Dividend yield	6.51%	2.82%
Payout ratio	67.11%	43.75%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FT	ISBA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.92%	7.59%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	13.32%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	5.76%	16.09%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, FT or ISBA?: FT has the lower trailing P/E: FT trades at 2.92 and ISBA at 14.62. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, FT or ISBA?: Over the past five years, ISBA grew revenue faster — FT at a 3.92% CAGR versus ISBA at 7.59%.
Does FT or ISBA pay a bigger dividend?: FT yields 6.51% and ISBA yields 2.82% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is FT or ISBA more profitable?: FT runs the higher net margin — FT at 179.50% versus ISBA at 18.77%.
How have FT and ISBA total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, FT delivered 7.98% and ISBA delivered 8.41% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FT analysis Full ISBA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Franklin Universal P/E ratio Isabella Bank P/E ratio Franklin Universal dividend yield Isabella Bank dividend yield Franklin Universal ROE Isabella Bank ROE Franklin Universal operating margin Isabella Bank operating margin Franklin Universal revenue growth Isabella Bank revenue growth Franklin Universal free cash flow Isabella Bank free cash flow

Franklin Universal & Isabella Bank appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 8, 2026.