Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) vs J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT)
CW leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics, though JBHT is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Curtiss-Wright Corporation and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
$771.93Industrials
JBHT
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
$271.22Industrials
Total return — CW vs JBHT
growth of $100 · last 30yCW +11721.3%JBHT +5186.9%CW compounded faster
CW JBHT
CW vs JBHT: by the numbers
- •CW is the larger company ($28.52B vs $25.58B market cap).
- •JBHT trades at the lower earnings multiple (41.98 vs 56.51 P/E).
- •CW converts more revenue to profit (14.17% vs 5.13% net margin).
- •CW grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.60% vs 4.00% CAGR).
- •JBHT pays the higher dividend yield (0.66% vs 0.13%).
Which is better, CW or JBHT?
Metric tally: CW 9 · JBHT 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueJBHT(lower P/E)
GrowthCW(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeJBHT(higher dividend yield)
QualityCW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CW | JBHT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 56.51 | 41.98● |
| Forward P/E | 45.23 | 29.54● |
| P/S ratio | 7.93 | 2.13● |
| P/B ratio | 10.87 | 7.18● |
| PEG ratio | 1.94● | 3.42 |
| EV / EBITDA | 35.96 | 17.25● |
| FCF yield | 2.07% | 4.00%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CW | JBHT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.17%● | 17.28% |
| Operating margin | 18.48%● | 7.36% |
| Net margin | 14.17%● | 5.13% |
| ROE | 19.42%● | 17.31% |
| ROIC | 12.41%● | 9.32% |
Dividends
| Metric | CW | JBHT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | 0.66%● |
| Payout ratio | 7.57% | 29.08% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CW | JBHT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.60%● | 4.00% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 21.79%● | 5.02% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 8.67% | 13.09%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 45.56%● | 12.75% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CW or JBHT?
- It depends on your goal. value: JBHT (lower P/E); growth: CW (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: JBHT (higher dividend yield); quality: CW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CW leads 9 to 8.
- Is CW or JBHT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, JBHT is cheaper: CW trades at a 56.51 P/E and JBHT at 41.98.
- Which has grown faster, CW or JBHT?
- Over the past five years, CW grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus JBHT at 4.00%.
- Does CW or JBHT pay a bigger dividend?
- CW yields 0.13% and JBHT yields 0.66% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CW or JBHT more profitable?
- CW runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus JBHT at 5.13%.
- Which has been the better investment, CW or JBHT?
- Over the past 10-year, CW delivered the higher annualized total return — CW at 25.40% versus JBHT at 14.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Curtiss-Wright P/E ratioJ.B. Hunt Transport Services P/E ratioCurtiss-Wright dividend yieldJ.B. Hunt Transport Services dividend yieldCurtiss-Wright ROEJ.B. Hunt Transport Services ROECurtiss-Wright operating marginJ.B. Hunt Transport Services operating marginCurtiss-Wright revenue growthJ.B. Hunt Transport Services revenue growthCurtiss-Wright free cash flowJ.B. Hunt Transport Services free cash flow
Curtiss-Wright & J.B. Hunt Transport Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.