Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Meta Platforms, Inc. (META)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Meta Platforms, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: COST is classified in Consumer Defensive; META is classified in Communication Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnCOST vs META

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
COST +528.3% (+20.2%/yr)META +406.4% (+17.6%/yr)COST compounded faster over this window
200400600Start $10020182020202220242026$628$506
COST META

COST vs META: by the numbers

  • META is the larger company ($1.65T vs $401.25B market cap).
  • META trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (24.42 vs 45.51 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • META converts more revenue to profit (29.84% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • META grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.85% vs 9.48% CAGR).
  • COST pays the higher dividend yield (0.61% vs 0.33%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCOSTMETA
P/E ratio45.5124.42
Forward P/E39.9220.64
P/S ratio1.377.23
P/B ratio11.976.32
EV / EBITDA28.3215.94
FCF yield2.19%2.48%

Profitability

MetricCOSTMETA
Gross margin12.88%81.75%
Operating margin3.82%38.08%
Net margin3.01%29.84%
ROE26.38%26.07%
ROIC19.01%17.18%

Dividends

MetricCOSTMETA
Dividend yield0.61%0.33%
Payout ratio27.87%7.91%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTMETA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%16.85%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%18.60%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%4.96%
Total return CAGR (5Y)14.89%11.41%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or META?
META has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 45.51 and META at 24.42. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or META?
Over the past five years, META grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus META at 16.85%.
Does COST or META pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.61% and META yields 0.33% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or META more profitable?
META runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus META at 29.84%.
How have COST and META total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.56% and META delivered 17.72% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.