Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Netflix, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: COST is classified in Consumer Defensive; NFLX is classified in Communication Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnCOST vs NFLX

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
COST +528.3% (+20.2%/yr)NFLX +663.9% (+22.5%/yr)NFLX compounded faster over this window
05001kStart $10020182020202220242026$628$764
COST NFLX

COST vs NFLX: by the numbers

  • COST is the larger company ($401.25B vs $322.29B market cap).
  • NFLX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (24.34 vs 45.51 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • NFLX converts more revenue to profit (28.22% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • NFLX grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.89% vs 9.48% CAGR).
  • COST pays a dividend (0.61% yield), while NFLX has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCOSTNFLX
P/E ratio45.5124.34
Forward P/E39.9221.51
P/S ratio1.376.66
P/B ratio11.9710.69
EV / EBITDA28.3210.23
FCF yield2.19%3.41%

Profitability

MetricCOSTNFLX
Gross margin12.88%49.12%
Operating margin3.82%29.68%
Net margin3.01%28.22%
ROE26.38%45.27%
ROIC19.01%24.34%

Dividends

MetricCOSTNFLX
Dividend yield0.61%N/A
Payout ratio27.87%N/A

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTNFLX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%11.89%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%32.58%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%51.23%
Total return CAGR (5Y)14.89%4.89%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or NFLX?
NFLX has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 45.51 and NFLX at 24.34. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or NFLX?
Over the past five years, NFLX grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus NFLX at 11.89%.
Does COST or NFLX pay a bigger dividend?
COST pays a dividend (0.61% yield), while NFLX has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is COST or NFLX more profitable?
NFLX runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus NFLX at 28.22%.
How have COST and NFLX total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.56% and NFLX delivered 22.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.