Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) vs W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB)
CINF and WRB are evenly matched — 7 metrics each of 14.
A side-by-side comparison of Cincinnati Financial Corporation and W. R. Berkley Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CINF
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
$169.01Financial Services
WRB
W. R. Berkley Corporation
$68.27Financial Services
Total return — CINF vs WRB
growth of $100 · last 30yCINF +837.4%WRB +4012.7%WRB compounded faster
CINF WRB
CINF vs WRB: by the numbers
- •CINF is the larger company ($26.14B vs $25.42B market cap).
- •CINF trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.66 vs 14.46 P/E).
- •CINF converts more revenue to profit (21.34% vs 12.64% net margin).
- •WRB grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.95% vs 5.55% CAGR).
- •WRB pays the higher dividend yield (2.72% vs 2.10%).
Which is better, CINF or WRB?
Metric tally: CINF 7 · WRB 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCINF(lower P/E)
GrowthWRB(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeWRB(higher dividend yield)
QualityCINF(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CINF | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.66● | 14.46 |
| Forward P/E | 19.47 | 14.58● |
| P/S ratio | 2.05 | 1.82● |
| P/B ratio | 1.68● | 2.77 |
| PEG ratio | 3.03● | 7.63 |
Profitability
| Metric | CINF | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 50.29%● | 26.14% |
| Operating margin | 26.68%● | 16.24% |
| Net margin | 21.34%● | 12.64% |
| ROE | 17.54% | 19.27%● |
| ROIC | 10.68%● | 10.42% |
Dividends
| Metric | CINF | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.10% | 2.72%● |
| Payout ratio | 23.40% | 41.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CINF | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.55% | 11.95%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 15.01% | 28.88%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 9.43% | 17.46%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CINF or WRB?
- It depends on your goal. value: CINF (lower P/E); growth: WRB (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WRB (higher dividend yield); quality: CINF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is CINF or WRB cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CINF is cheaper: CINF trades at a 9.66 P/E and WRB at 14.46.
- Which has grown faster, CINF or WRB?
- Over the past five years, WRB grew revenue faster — CINF at a 5.55% CAGR versus WRB at 11.95%.
- Does CINF or WRB pay a bigger dividend?
- CINF yields 2.10% and WRB yields 2.72% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CINF or WRB more profitable?
- CINF runs the higher net margin — CINF at 21.34% versus WRB at 12.64%.
- Which has been the better investment, CINF or WRB?
- Over the past 10-year, WRB delivered the higher annualized total return — CINF at 12.06% versus WRB at 17.34%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cincinnati Financial P/E ratioW. R. Berkley P/E ratioCincinnati Financial dividend yieldW. R. Berkley dividend yieldCincinnati Financial ROEW. R. Berkley ROECincinnati Financial operating marginW. R. Berkley operating marginCincinnati Financial revenue growthW. R. Berkley revenue growthCincinnati Financial free cash flowW. R. Berkley free cash flow
Cincinnati Financial & W. R. Berkley appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.