Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)
A side-by-side comparison of Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
$344.72TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
$197.02TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CDNS vs NVDA
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 28yCDNS +907.7%NVDA +522434.1%NVDA compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CDNS NVDA
CDNS vs NVDA: by the numbers
- •NVDA is the larger company ($4.77T vs $95.08B market cap).
- •NVDA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (30.09 vs 67.32 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NVDA converts more revenue to profit (62.97% vs 23.61% net margin).
- •NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.23% vs 15.04% CAGR).
- •NVDA pays a dividend (0.02% yield), while CDNS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CDNS | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 67.32 | 30.09 |
| Forward P/E | 42.16 | 41.87 |
| P/S ratio | 15.95 | 18.91 |
| P/B ratio | 13.58 | 24.52 |
| PEG ratio | 14.86 | 0.57 |
| EV / EBITDA | 46.87 | 28.96 |
| FCF yield | 1.80% | 2.48% |
Profitability
| Metric | CDNS | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 88.50% | 74.15% |
| Operating margin | 30.83% | 64.02% |
| Net margin | 23.61% | 62.97% |
| ROE | 20.09% | 81.65% |
| ROIC | 14.11% | 62.88% |
Dividends
| Metric | CDNS | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.02% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 0.61% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CDNS | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.04% | 68.23% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 13.62% | 85.78% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 15.03% | 85.52% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 18.88% | 59.29% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CDNS or NVDA?
- NVDA has the lower trailing P/E: CDNS trades at 67.32 and NVDA at 30.09. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CDNS or NVDA?
- Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — CDNS at a 15.04% CAGR versus NVDA at 68.23%.
- Does CDNS or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?
- NVDA pays a dividend (0.02% yield), while CDNS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CDNS or NVDA more profitable?
- NVDA runs the higher net margin — CDNS at 23.61% versus NVDA at 62.97%.
- How have CDNS and NVDA total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CDNS delivered 30.48% and NVDA delivered 64.27% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cadence Design Systems P/E ratioNVIDIA P/E ratioCadence Design Systems dividend yieldNVIDIA dividend yieldCadence Design Systems ROENVIDIA ROECadence Design Systems operating marginNVIDIA operating marginCadence Design Systems revenue growthNVIDIA revenue growthCadence Design Systems free cash flowNVIDIA free cash flow
Cadence Design Systems & NVIDIA appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.