Which has the lower trailing P/E, CDNS or QCOM?

QCOM has the lower trailing P/E: CDNS trades at 67.32 and QCOM at 18.24. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CDNS or QCOM?

Over the past five years, CDNS grew revenue faster — CDNS at a 15.04% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.

Does CDNS or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?

QCOM pays a dividend (2.11% yield), while CDNS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CDNS or QCOM more profitable?

CDNS runs the higher net margin — CDNS at 23.61% versus QCOM at 22.31%.

How have CDNS and QCOM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CDNS delivered 30.48% and QCOM delivered 13.58% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)

A side-by-side comparison of Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CDNS

Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

$95.08B

$344.72TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

QCOM

QUALCOMM Incorporated

$171.68B

$162.88TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CDNS vs QCOM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y

CDNS +2169.5%QCOM +11063.6%QCOM compounded faster

CDNS QCOM

CDNS vs QCOM: by the numbers

•QCOM is the larger company ($171.68B vs $95.08B market cap).
•QCOM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.24 vs 67.32 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CDNS converts more revenue to profit (23.61% vs 22.31% net margin).
•CDNS grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.04% vs 8.63% CAGR).
•QCOM pays a dividend (2.11% yield), while CDNS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CDNS	QCOM
P/E ratio	67.32	18.24
Forward P/E	42.16	15.79
P/S ratio	15.95	4.10
P/B ratio	13.58	6.68
PEG ratio	14.86	3.18
EV / EBITDA	46.87	14.61
FCF yield	1.80%	6.86%

Profitability

Metric	CDNS	QCOM
Gross margin	88.50%	54.80%
Operating margin	30.83%	25.52%
Net margin	23.61%	22.31%
ROE	20.09%	36.38%
ROIC	14.11%	13.15%

Dividends

Metric	CDNS	QCOM
Dividend yield	N/A	2.11%
Payout ratio	N/A	70.95%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CDNS	QCOM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.04%	8.63%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	13.62%	5.74%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	15.03%	9.39%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	18.88%	6.10%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CDNS or QCOM?: QCOM has the lower trailing P/E: CDNS trades at 67.32 and QCOM at 18.24. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CDNS or QCOM?: Over the past five years, CDNS grew revenue faster — CDNS at a 15.04% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
Does CDNS or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?: QCOM pays a dividend (2.11% yield), while CDNS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CDNS or QCOM more profitable?: CDNS runs the higher net margin — CDNS at 23.61% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
How have CDNS and QCOM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CDNS delivered 30.48% and QCOM delivered 13.58% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CDNS analysis Full QCOM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cadence Design Systems P/E ratio QUALCOMM P/E ratio Cadence Design Systems dividend yield QUALCOMM dividend yield Cadence Design Systems ROE QUALCOMM ROE Cadence Design Systems operating margin QUALCOMM operating margin Cadence Design Systems revenue growth QUALCOMM revenue growth Cadence Design Systems free cash flow QUALCOMM free cash flow

Cadence Design Systems & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.