BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) vs Isabella Bank Corporation (ISBA)
BGT leads on 10 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust and Isabella Bank Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BGT
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust
$10.66Financial Services
ISBA
Isabella Bank Corporation
$40.31Financial Services
Total return — BGT vs ISBA
growth of $100 · last 22yBGT -46.7%ISBA +19.0%ISBA compounded faster
BGT ISBA
BGT vs ISBA: by the numbers
- •BGT is the larger company ($318M vs $296M market cap).
- •BGT trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.78 vs 14.87 P/E).
- •BGT converts more revenue to profit (71.60% vs 17.23% net margin).
- •BGT grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.30% vs 9.06% CAGR).
- •BGT pays the higher dividend yield (13.54% vs 2.78%).
Which is better, BGT or ISBA?
Metric tally: BGT 10 · ISBA 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBGT(lower P/E)
GrowthBGT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBGT(higher dividend yield)
QualityBGT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BGT | ISBA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.78● | 14.87 |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.35 |
| P/S ratio | 7.45 | 2.56● |
| P/B ratio | 0.81● | 1.26 |
| PEG ratio | 0.22● | 0.52 |
Profitability
| Metric | BGT | ISBA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 96.00%● | 71.36% |
| Operating margin | 87.84%● | 20.07% |
| Net margin | 71.60%● | 17.23% |
| ROE | 7.75% | 8.53%● |
| ROIC | 4.57%● | 4.45% |
Dividends
| Metric | BGT | ISBA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 13.54%● | 2.78% |
| Payout ratio | 197.72% | 43.75% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BGT | ISBA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.30%● | 9.06% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 43.50%● | 13.32% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.61% | 16.82%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BGT or ISBA?
- It depends on your goal. value: BGT (lower P/E); growth: BGT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BGT (higher dividend yield); quality: BGT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BGT leads 10 to 3.
- Is BGT or ISBA cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BGT is cheaper: BGT trades at a 9.78 P/E and ISBA at 14.87.
- Which has grown faster, BGT or ISBA?
- Over the past five years, BGT grew revenue faster — BGT at a 9.30% CAGR versus ISBA at 9.06%.
- Does BGT or ISBA pay a bigger dividend?
- BGT yields 13.54% and ISBA yields 2.78% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BGT or ISBA more profitable?
- BGT runs the higher net margin — BGT at 71.60% versus ISBA at 17.23%.
- Which has been the better investment, BGT or ISBA?
- Over the past 10-year, ISBA delivered the higher annualized total return — BGT at 6.43% versus ISBA at 8.54%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
BlackRock Floating Rate Income P/E ratioIsabella Bank P/E ratioBlackRock Floating Rate Income dividend yieldIsabella Bank dividend yieldBlackRock Floating Rate Income ROEIsabella Bank ROEBlackRock Floating Rate Income operating marginIsabella Bank operating marginBlackRock Floating Rate Income revenue growthIsabella Bank revenue growthBlackRock Floating Rate Income free cash flowIsabella Bank free cash flow
BlackRock Floating Rate Income & Isabella Bank appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.