Which has the lower trailing P/E, BESIY or DT?

BESIY has the lower trailing P/E: BESIY trades at 73.28 and DT at 102.09. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BESIY or DT?

Over the past five years, DT grew revenue faster — BESIY at a 4.09% CAGR versus DT at 22.57%.

Does BESIY or DT pay a bigger dividend?

BESIY pays a dividend (0.83% yield), while DT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is BESIY or DT more profitable?

BESIY runs the higher net margin — BESIY at 28.38% versus DT at 7.22%.

How have BESIY and DT total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, BESIY delivered 34.80% and DT delivered -5.99% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

BE Semiconductor Industries N.V. (BESIY) vs Dynatrace, Inc. (DT)

A side-by-side comparison of BE Semiconductor Industries N.V. and Dynatrace, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

BESIY

BE Semiconductor Industries N.V.

$17.58B

$222.00TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 1:55 PM EDT

Dynatrace, Inc.

$15.45B

$53.01TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 3:20 PM EDT

Total return — BESIY vs DT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7y

BESIY +800.6% (+36.9%/yr)DT +113.3% (+11.4%/yr)BESIY compounded faster over this window

BESIY DT

BESIY vs DT: by the numbers

•BESIY is the larger company ($17.58B vs $15.45B market cap).
•BESIY trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (73.28 vs 102.09 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•BESIY converts more revenue to profit (28.38% vs 7.22% net margin).
•DT grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.57% vs 4.09% CAGR).
•BESIY pays a dividend (0.83% yield), while DT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BESIY	DT
P/E ratio	73.28	102.09
Forward P/E	50.45	30.22
P/S ratio	20.79	7.13
P/B ratio	27.03	6.10
EV / EBITDA	50.68	47.08
FCF yield	1.55%	3.80%

Profitability

Metric	BESIY	DT
Gross margin	62.49%	81.37%
Operating margin	35.78%	13.03%
Net margin	28.38%	7.22%
ROE	36.90%	6.18%
ROIC	24.31%	5.60%

Dividends

Metric	BESIY	DT
Dividend yield	0.83%	N/A
Payout ratio	98.31%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BESIY	DT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.09%	22.57%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-3.31%	14.87%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.06%	17.43%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	22.16%	-5.99%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BESIY or DT?: BESIY has the lower trailing P/E: BESIY trades at 73.28 and DT at 102.09. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BESIY or DT?: Over the past five years, DT grew revenue faster — BESIY at a 4.09% CAGR versus DT at 22.57%.
Does BESIY or DT pay a bigger dividend?: BESIY pays a dividend (0.83% yield), while DT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is BESIY or DT more profitable?: BESIY runs the higher net margin — BESIY at 28.38% versus DT at 7.22%.
How have BESIY and DT total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, BESIY delivered 34.80% and DT delivered -5.99% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BESIY analysis Full DT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

BE Semiconductor Industries P/E ratio Dynatrace P/E ratio BE Semiconductor Industries dividend yield BE Semiconductor Industries ROE Dynatrace ROE BE Semiconductor Industries operating margin Dynatrace operating margin BE Semiconductor Industries revenue growth Dynatrace revenue growth BE Semiconductor Industries free cash flow Dynatrace free cash flow

BE Semiconductor Industries & Dynatrace appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 3, 2026.