Is BAM or NU cheaper?

On trailing earnings, NU is cheaper: BAM trades at a 28.97 P/E and NU at 20.26.

Which has grown faster, BAM or NU?

Over the past five years, NU grew revenue faster — BAM at a 16.43% CAGR versus NU at 98.88%.

Does BAM or NU pay a bigger dividend?

BAM pays a dividend (4.50% yield) while NU does not currently pay one.

Is BAM or NU more profitable?

BAM runs the higher net margin — BAM at 52.33% versus NU at 18.15%.

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) vs Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU)

NU leads on 7 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. and Nu Holdings Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

BAM

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.

$71.25B

$44.62Financial Services

Nu Holdings Ltd.

$63.78B

$13.17Financial Services

Total return — BAM vs NU

growth of $100 · last 4y

BAM +39.4%NU +202.1%NU compounded faster

BAM NU

BAM vs NU: by the numbers

•BAM is the larger company ($71.25B vs $63.78B market cap).
•NU trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.26 vs 28.97 P/E).
•BAM converts more revenue to profit (52.33% vs 18.15% net margin).
•NU grew revenue faster over the past five years (98.88% vs 16.43% CAGR).
•BAM pays a dividend (4.50% yield) while NU does not currently pay one.

Which is better, BAM or NU?

Metric tally: BAM 4 · NU 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueNU(lower P/E)

GrowthNU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityNU(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BAM	NU
P/E ratio	28.97	20.26●
Forward P/E	25.20	15.59●
P/S ratio	15.10	3.69●
P/B ratio	9.49	5.14●
PEG ratio	2.15	0.65●

Profitability

Metric	BAM	NU
Gross margin	71.84%●	43.74%
Operating margin	63.13%●	22.96%
Net margin	52.33%●	18.15%
ROE	32.88%●	25.29%
ROIC	14.45%	16.31%●

Dividends

Metric	BAM	NU
Dividend yield	4.50%	—
Payout ratio	130.52%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BAM	NU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	16.43%	98.88%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, BAM or NU?: It depends on your goal. value: NU (lower P/E); growth: NU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: NU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NU leads 7 to 4.
Is BAM or NU cheaper?: On trailing earnings, NU is cheaper: BAM trades at a 28.97 P/E and NU at 20.26.
Which has grown faster, BAM or NU?: Over the past five years, NU grew revenue faster — BAM at a 16.43% CAGR versus NU at 98.88%.
Does BAM or NU pay a bigger dividend?: BAM pays a dividend (4.50% yield) while NU does not currently pay one.
Is BAM or NU more profitable?: BAM runs the higher net margin — BAM at 52.33% versus NU at 18.15%.

Go deeper

Full BAM analysis Full NU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Brookfield Asset Management P/E ratio Nu P/E ratio Brookfield Asset Management dividend yield Nu dividend yield Brookfield Asset Management ROE Nu ROE Brookfield Asset Management operating margin Nu operating margin Brookfield Asset Management revenue growth Nu revenue growth Brookfield Asset Management free cash flow Nu free cash flow

Brookfield Asset Management & Nu appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.