ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)
NVDA leads on 15 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of ASML Holding N.V. and NVIDIA Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
$1757.09TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
$206.84TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — ASML vs NVDA
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 28yASML +9785.0%NVDA +549902.3%NVDA compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
ASML NVDA
ASML vs NVDA: by the numbers
- •NVDA is the larger company ($5.01T vs $677.21B market cap).
- •NVDA trades at the lower earnings multiple (31.68 vs 54.97 P/E).
- •NVDA converts more revenue to profit (62.97% vs 30.10% net margin).
- •NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.23% vs 15.77% CAGR).
- •ASML pays the higher dividend yield (0.50% vs 0.01%).
Which is better, ASML or NVDA?
Metric tally: ASML 2 · NVDA 15It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNVDA(lower P/E)
GrowthNVDA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeASML(higher dividend yield)
QualityNVDA(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ASML | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 54.97 | 31.68● |
| Forward P/E | 46.75 | 44.07● |
| P/S ratio | 16.49● | 19.90 |
| P/B ratio | 27.13 | 25.81● |
| PEG ratio | 1.29 | 0.57● |
| EV / EBITDA | 42.66 | 30.48● |
| FCF yield | 1.68% | 2.36%● |
Profitability
| Metric | ASML | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 52.72% | 74.15%● |
| Operating margin | 35.41% | 64.02%● |
| Net margin | 30.10% | 62.97%● |
| ROE | 49.52% | 81.65%● |
| ROIC | 35.54% | 62.88%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ASML | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.50%● | 0.01% |
| Payout ratio | 30.25% | 0.61% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ASML | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.77% | 68.23%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 24.63% | 85.78%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 8.44% | 85.52%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 19.70% | 60.31%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ASML or NVDA?
- It depends on your goal. value: NVDA (lower P/E); growth: NVDA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ASML (higher dividend yield); quality: NVDA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NVDA leads 15 to 2.
- Is ASML or NVDA cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NVDA is cheaper: ASML trades at a 54.97 P/E and NVDA at 31.68.
- Which has grown faster, ASML or NVDA?
- Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — ASML at a 15.77% CAGR versus NVDA at 68.23%.
- Does ASML or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?
- ASML yields 0.50% and NVDA yields 0.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ASML or NVDA more profitable?
- NVDA runs the higher net margin — ASML at 30.10% versus NVDA at 62.97%.
- Which has been the better investment, ASML or NVDA?
- Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — ASML at 33.67% versus NVDA at 65.42%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
ASML P/E ratioNVIDIA P/E ratioASML dividend yieldNVIDIA dividend yieldASML ROENVIDIA ROEASML operating marginNVIDIA operating marginASML revenue growthNVIDIA revenue growthASML free cash flowNVIDIA free cash flow
ASML & NVIDIA appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.