ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of ASML Holding N.V. and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
$1757.09TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$166.97TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — ASML vs QCOM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yASML +45294.5%QCOM +10862.1%ASML compounded faster
ASML QCOM
ASML vs QCOM: by the numbers
- •ASML is the larger company ($677.21B vs $175.99B market cap).
- •QCOM trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.92 vs 54.97 P/E).
- •ASML converts more revenue to profit (30.10% vs 22.31% net margin).
- •ASML grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.77% vs 8.63% CAGR).
- •QCOM pays the higher dividend yield (2.15% vs 0.50%).
Which is better, ASML or QCOM?
Metric tally: ASML 8 · QCOM 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueQCOM(lower P/E)
GrowthASML(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeQCOM(higher dividend yield)
QualityASML(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ASML | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 54.97 | 17.92● |
| Forward P/E | 46.75 | 15.50● |
| P/S ratio | 16.49 | 4.02● |
| P/B ratio | 27.13 | 6.56● |
| PEG ratio | 1.29● | 3.12 |
| EV / EBITDA | 42.66 | 14.36● |
| FCF yield | 1.68% | 6.98%● |
Profitability
| Metric | ASML | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 52.72% | 54.80%● |
| Operating margin | 35.41%● | 25.52% |
| Net margin | 30.10%● | 22.31% |
| ROE | 49.52%● | 36.38% |
| ROIC | 35.54%● | 13.15% |
Dividends
| Metric | ASML | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.50% | 2.15%● |
| Payout ratio | 30.25% | 70.95% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ASML | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.77%● | 8.63% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 24.63%● | 5.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 8.44% | 9.39%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 19.70%● | 5.13% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ASML or QCOM?
- It depends on your goal. value: QCOM (lower P/E); growth: ASML (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: QCOM (higher dividend yield); quality: ASML (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, QCOM leads 9 to 8.
- Is ASML or QCOM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, QCOM is cheaper: ASML trades at a 54.97 P/E and QCOM at 17.92.
- Which has grown faster, ASML or QCOM?
- Over the past five years, ASML grew revenue faster — ASML at a 15.77% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
- Does ASML or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?
- ASML yields 0.50% and QCOM yields 2.15% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ASML or QCOM more profitable?
- ASML runs the higher net margin — ASML at 30.10% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
- Which has been the better investment, ASML or QCOM?
- Over the past 10-year, ASML delivered the higher annualized total return — ASML at 33.67% versus QCOM at 13.61%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
ASML P/E ratioQUALCOMM P/E ratioASML dividend yieldQUALCOMM dividend yieldASML ROEQUALCOMM ROEASML operating marginQUALCOMM operating marginASML revenue growthQUALCOMM revenue growthASML free cash flowQUALCOMM free cash flow
ASML & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.