American Tower Corporation (AMT) vs Mastercard Incorporated (MA)

A side-by-side comparison of American Tower Corporation and Mastercard Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: AMT is classified in Real Estate; MA is classified in Financial Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnAMT vs MA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
AMT +102.5% (+7.3%/yr)MA +498.8% (+19.6%/yr)MA compounded faster over this window
200400600Start $10020182020202220242026$203$599
AMT MA

AMT vs MA: by the numbers

  • MA is the larger company ($499.20B vs $82.87B market cap).
  • MA converts more revenue to profit (46.34% vs 30.88% net margin).
  • MA grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.09% vs 4.95% CAGR).
  • AMT pays the higher dividend yield (4.04% vs 0.60%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricAMTMA
P/E ratio24.4631.31
Forward P/E25.5228.52
P/S ratio7.5714.23
P/B ratio22.2888.97
EV / EBITDA18.15N/A
FCF yield4.78%N/A

For REITs like American Tower Corporation, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.

Profitability

MetricAMTMA
Gross margin73.19%100.00%
Operating margin44.40%59.84%
Net margin30.88%46.34%
ROE90.83%289.73%
ROIC7.27%N/A

Dividends

MetricAMTMA
Dividend yield4.04%0.60%
Payout ratio96.01%18.54%

American Tower Corporation's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.

Growth (annualized)

MetricAMTMA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)4.95%16.09%
EPS CAGR (5Y)7.23%20.93%
FCF CAGR (5Y)6.23%N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)-7.19%10.88%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, AMT or MA?
Over the past five years, MA grew revenue faster — AMT at a 4.95% CAGR versus MA at 16.09%.
Does AMT or MA pay a bigger dividend?
AMT yields 4.04% and MA yields 0.60% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AMT or MA more profitable?
MA runs the higher net margin — AMT at 30.88% versus MA at 46.34%.
How have AMT and MA total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, AMT delivered 7.31% and MA delivered 19.83% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.