Basis: Trailing twelve months (TTM). Source: stored company filings and market data; unavailable inputs remain N/A.
The forward PE ratio is 41.51.
Forward PE Ratio (41.51) = Close Price ($36.95) / Consensus Forward EPS ($0.94)
FORWARD PE RATIO
41.51
SECTOR MEDIAN · TECHNOLOGY
27.14
median of 147 covered companies
CURRENT VS SECTOR MEDIAN
+52.95%
vs the sector median at left
Viavi Solutions Inc.
Market Cap
$9.12B
Forward PE Ratio
41.51
| NAME | MARKET CAP | FORWARD PE RATIO |
|---|---|---|
| Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) | $9.12B | 41.51 |
| UiPath Inc. (PATH)vs › | $8.81B | 24.33 |
| InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC)vs › | $8.80B | 37.74 |
| Rambus Inc. (RMBS)vs › | $9.44B | 30.07 |
| Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. (AAOI)vs › | $8.64B | 145.45 |
| FormFactor, Inc. (FORM)vs › | $8.41B | 37.45 |
| Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS)vs › | $10.06B | 13.32 |
| Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY)vs › | $8.16B | 18.93 |
| Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)vs › | $8.16B | 23.09 |
| Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC)vs › | $10.35B | 18.96 |
Trailing P/E
N/A
reported TTM EPS
Forward P/E
41.5
consensus next-FY EPS
At today's $36.95 close, each upcoming fiscal year's consensus EPS implies a different multiple — how quickly the price is "paid down" by expected earnings if the estimates hold.
| Fiscal year end | Consensus EPS | Estimate range | Analysts | Implied P/E |
|---|
PE Ratio = Share Price / Diluted EPS (TTM)
The price-to-earnings ratio measures how much investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings. A lower PE can indicate a cheaper valuation; a higher PE implies higher growth expectations.
Expanded definitions: Investopedia, Wikipedia, Corporate Finance Institute
| 2027-06-27 | $1.64 | $1.35 – $1.82 | 5 | 22.5x |
| 2028-06-27 | $1.95 | $1.82 – $2.08 | 4 | 18.9x |
| 2029-06-27 | $2.51 | $2.40 – $2.64 | 1 | 14.7x |
Source: FMP analyst consensus estimates, refreshed with the daily precompute. "n/m" = the consensus EPS is not positive, so a multiple is undefined. There is no forward P/E history chart here because charting one would require the estimates as they stood in the past, which we do not store — see the trailing P/E history for how the realized multiple has moved.
