Basis: Latest reported fiscal quarter. Source: stored company filings and market data; unavailable inputs remain N/A.
Is the debt to assets ratio high or low?
The debt to assets ratio of 42.82% is in line with its 5-year average of 40.53%, near the high end of its 5-year range (39.14%–42.82%).
As of the fiscal period ended Tuesday, June 30, 2026. 3.48% above its 12-month average of 41.38%.
Reported quarterly debt to assets ratio; no daily interpolation.
DEBT TO ASSETS RATIO
42.82%
DEBT TO ASSETS RATIO AVG TTM
41.38%
DEBT TO ASSETS RATIO AVG 3Y
40.87%
DEBT TO ASSETS RATIO AVG 5Y
40.53%
DEBT TO ASSETS RATIO AVG 10Y
40.14%
DEBT TO ASSETS RATIO AVG 15Y
39.97%
DEBT TO ASSETS RATIO AVG 20Y
40.04%
CURRENT VS TTM AVG
+3.48%
CURRENT VS 3Y AVG
+4.78%
CURRENT VS 5Y AVG
+5.66%
CURRENT VS 10Y AVG
+6.70%
CURRENT VS 15Y AVG
+7.15%
CURRENT VS 20Y AVG
+6.97%
SECTOR MEDIAN · CONSUMER CYCLICAL
0.39%
median of 94 covered companies
CURRENT VS SECTOR MEDIAN
+10880.69%
vs the sector median at left
Toyota Motor Corporation
Market Cap
$232.74B
Debt to Assets Ratio
42.82%
TTM Avg
41.38%
3Y Avg
40.87%
5Y Avg
40.53%
Market Cap
$258.61B
Debt to Assets Ratio
0.26%
TTM Avg
N/A
3Y Avg
N/A
5Y Avg
N/A
Market Cap
$273.24B
Debt to Assets Ratio
0.14%
TTM Avg
N/A
3Y Avg
N/A
5Y Avg
N/A
Market Cap
$191.80B
Debt to Assets Ratio
0.09%
TTM Avg
N/A
3Y Avg
N/A
5Y Avg
N/A
Market Cap
$187.25B
Debt to Assets Ratio
0.91%
TTM Avg
N/A
3Y Avg
N/A
5Y Avg
N/A
Market Cap
$154.27B
Debt to Assets Ratio
0.70%
TTM Avg
N/A
3Y Avg
N/A
5Y Avg
N/A
Market Cap
$147.93B
Debt to Assets Ratio
0.39%
TTM Avg
N/A
3Y Avg
N/A
5Y Avg
N/A
Market Cap
$121.13B
Debt to Assets Ratio
0.79%
TTM Avg
N/A
3Y Avg
N/A
5Y Avg
N/A
| NAME | MARKET CAP | DEBT TO ASSETS RATIO | TTM | 3Y | 5Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) | $232.74B | 42.82% | 41.38% | 40.87% | 40.53% |
| LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMUY)vs › | $258.61B | 0.26% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA)vs › | $273.24B | 0.14% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Hermes International Societe en commandite par actions Unsponsored ADR (HESAY)vs › | $191.80B | 0.09% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| McDonald's Corporation (MCD)vs › | $187.25B | 0.91% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG)vs › | $154.27B | 0.70% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| The TJX Companies, Inc. (TJX)vs › | $147.93B | 0.39% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| The Home Depot, Inc. (HD)vs › | $326.88B | 0.44% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Starbucks Corporation (SBUX)vs › | $121.13B | 0.79% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PDD Holdings Inc. (PDD)vs › | $119.57B | 0.01% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Debt/Assets
42.8%
Debt/Equity
1.18
Current Ratio
1.17
Interest Coverage
62.5x
Formula: Debt/Assets = Total Debt / Total Assets × 100
Debt/Assets vs Debt/Equity:
Industry context matters: Capital-intensive industries (utilities, real estate) typically have higher Debt/Assets ratios than tech companies.
Debt/Assets ratio shows what percentage of a company's assets are financed by debt. Compare the current value with the historical chart and peer group to understand leverage over time.
Expanded definitions: Investopedia, Wikipedia, Corporate Finance Institute
| DATE | DEBT TO ASSETS RATIO |
|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | 42.82% |
| 2026-03-31 | 40.94% |
| 2025-12-31 | 41.16% |
| 2025-09-30 | 40.86% |
| 2025-06-30 | 41.13% |
| 2025-03-31 | 41.44% |
| 2024-12-31 | 41.81% |
| 2024-09-30 | 40.95% |
| 2024-06-30 | 41.38% |
| 2024-03-31 | 40.57% |
| 2023-12-31 | 40.32% |
| 2023-09-30 | 39.92% |
| 2023-06-30 | 39.95% |
| 2023-03-31 | 39.54% |
| 2022-12-31 | 39.76% |
| 2022-09-30 | 40.01% |
| 2022-06-30 | 40.41% |
| 2022-03-31 | 39.14% |
| 2021-12-31 | 39.49% |
| 2021-09-30 | 39.86% |
| 2021-06-30 | 39.68% |
| 2021-03-31 | 41.21% |
| 2020-12-31 | 41.33% |
| 2020-09-30 | 41.70% |
| 2020-06-30 | 42.94% |
| 2020-03-31 | 39.54% |
| 2019-12-31 | 38.86% |
| 2019-09-30 | 38.27% |
| 2019-06-30 | 38.66% |
| 2019-03-31 | 38.80% |
| 2018-12-31 | 39.60% |
| 2018-09-30 | 39.77% |
| 2018-06-30 | 39.65% |
| 2018-03-31 | 38.46% |
| 2017-12-31 | 39.76% |
| 2017-09-30 | 39.59% |
| 2017-06-30 | 39.59% |
| 2017-03-31 | 39.29% |
| 2016-12-31 | 40.42% |
| 2016-09-30 | 38.52% |
| 2016-06-30 | 38.48% |
| 2016-03-31 | 38.57% |
| 2015-12-31 | 40.03% |
| 2015-09-30 | 40.15% |
| 2015-06-30 | 40.28% |
| 2015-03-31 | 39.76% |
| 2014-12-31 | 41.20% |
| 2014-09-30 | 40.30% |
| 2014-06-30 | 39.77% |
| 2014-03-31 | 39.40% |
| 2013-12-31 | 40.41% |
| 2013-09-30 | 39.75% |
| 2013-06-30 | 39.59% |
| 2013-03-31 | 39.83% |
| 2012-12-31 | 40.11% |
| 2012-09-30 | 38.95% |
| 2012-06-30 | 39.05% |
| 2012-03-31 | 39.17% |
| 2011-12-31 | 40.67% |
| 2011-09-30 | 40.13% |
| 2011-06-30 | 41.22% |
| 2011-03-31 | 41.59% |
| 2010-09-30 | 41.03% |
| 2010-06-30 | 41.39% |
| 2010-03-31 | 41.23% |
| 2009-12-31 | 42.57% |
| 2009-09-30 | 41.97% |
| 2009-06-30 | 43.15% |
| 2009-03-31 | 43.42% |
| 2008-12-31 | 40.09% |
| 2008-09-30 | 38.90% |
| 2008-06-30 | 39.34% |
| 2008-03-31 | 37.62% |
| 2007-12-31 | 39.51% |
| 2007-09-30 | 38.41% |
| 2007-06-30 | 38.26% |
| 2007-03-31 | 37.23% |
| 2006-12-31 | 38.29% |
| 2006-09-30 | 37.65% |
| 2006-06-30 | 37.32% |
| 2006-03-31 | 36.19% |
| 2005-12-31 | 37.28% |
| 2005-09-30 | 36.41% |
| 2005-06-30 | 36.56% |
| 2005-03-31 | 35.12% |
| 2004-12-31 | 35.83% |
| 2004-09-30 | 35.40% |
| 2004-06-30 | 34.85% |
| 2004-03-31 | 34.31% |
| 2003-12-31 | 35.87% |
| 2003-09-30 | 34.86% |
| 2003-06-30 | 36.56% |
| 2003-03-31 | 36.01% |
| 2002-12-31 | 35.57% |
| 2002-09-30 | 35.19% |
| 2002-03-31 | 34.74% |
