Basis: Latest reported fiscal quarter. Source: stored company filings and market data; unavailable inputs remain N/A.
The FCF payout ratio is N/A as of the fiscal period ended Friday, March 31, 2017.
Rolling trailing-12-month FCF payout ratio sampled each quarter; raw quarterly payout is intentionally not charted. Q1 FY2017 (2017-03-31): 80.45%.
FCF PAYOUT RATIO
N/A
FCF PAYOUT RATIO AVG TTM
138.55%
FCF PAYOUT RATIO AVG 3Y
N/A
FCF PAYOUT RATIO AVG 5Y
N/A
FCF PAYOUT RATIO AVG 10Y
N/A
FCF PAYOUT RATIO AVG 15Y
N/A
FCF PAYOUT RATIO AVG 20Y
N/A
CURRENT VS TTM AVG
N/A
CURRENT VS 3Y AVG
N/A
CURRENT VS 5Y AVG
N/A
CURRENT VS 10Y AVG
N/A
CURRENT VS 15Y AVG
N/A
CURRENT VS 20Y AVG
N/A
FCF Payout Ratio TTM
N/A
Earnings Payout Ratio
N/A
Dividend Yield
N/A
FCF Yield
3.29%
| Year | Free Cash Flow | Dividends Paid | FCF Payout Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ($680.00M) | $0 | N/A (Loss) |
| 2024 | $1.30B | $0 | 0.0% |
| 2023 | $1.21B | $0 | 0.0% |
| 2022 | ($373.00M) | $0 | N/A (Loss) |
| 2021 | $496.00M | $0 | 0.0% |
| 2020 | ($8.67B) | $43.00M | N/A (Loss) |
Formula: FCF Payout Ratio TTM = trailing 4Q dividends paid / trailing 4Q free cash flow × 100
FCF payout and earnings payout:
Reading the series: Use the chart and table to compare dividend payments with cash generation over time.
FCF Payout Ratio measures trailing dividends paid as a percentage of trailing free cash flow. Unlike earnings-based payout, it compares dividends with cash generated after capital expenditures.
Expanded definitions: Investopedia, Wikipedia, Corporate Finance Institute
| DATE | FCF PAYOUT RATIO |
|---|---|
| 2017-03-31 | 80.45% |
| 2016-12-31 | 28.25% |
| 2016-09-30 | 75.31% |
| 2016-06-30 | 154.82% |
| 2016-03-31 | 353.95% |
| 2015-12-31 | 283.67% |
| 2015-09-30 | 30.92% |
| 2019 | ($453.00M) | $178.00M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2018 | ($212.00M) | $186.00M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2017 | ($1.23B) | $198.00M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2016 | $793.00M | $224.00M | 28.2% |
| 2015 | $98.00M | $278.00M | 283.7% |
| 2014 | ($2.23B) | $144.00M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2013 | ($2.44B) | $1.08B | N/A (Loss) |
| 2012 | ($603.00M) | $970.00M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2011 | ($934.00M) | $2.22B | N/A (Loss) |
| 2010 | ($721.00M) | $302.00M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2009 | ($591.00M) | $0 | N/A (Loss) |
| 2008 | ($2.27B) | $1.55B | N/A (Loss) |
| 2007 | $1.22B | $1.54B | 126.0% |
| 2006 | $1.41B | $2.89B | 205.0% |
| 2005 | $343.00M | $1.14B | 331.5% |
| 2004 | ($310.00M) | $827.00M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2003 | ($79.00M) | $741.00M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2002 | ($2.99B) | $732.36M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2001 | ($3.13B) | $0 | N/A (Loss) |
| 2000 | ($536.00M) | $0 | N/A (Loss) |
| 1999 | ($1.27B) | $0 | N/A (Loss) |
| 1998 | $534.00M | $0 | 0.0% |
| 1997 | $1.53B | $0 | 0.0% |
| 1996 | $2.17B | $0 | 0.0% |
