Is Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) Fairly Valued?
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation valuation review using P/E, fair value, revenue growth, EPS growth, net margin, and TGMCharts chart exhibits as of July 10, 2026.
By TGMCharts Research · Data as of · Updated
Evaluating Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation requires balancing its market multiple against its operational trajectory. The stock is valued at 36.95x of its trailing net income, while the independent analyst DCF (FMP) reference point sits at $256, indicating the equity is valued in line with projected cash flows.
A comprehensive valuation assessment relies on linking historical execution with current pricing. The company has delivered a five-year revenue CAGR of 8.13% alongside a five-year EPS CAGR of 25.77%. Combined with a net margin of 10.52%, these metrics help determine whether the current trailing earnings multiple is fundamentally justified or overextended.
- Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation closed at $261 on July 10, 2026.
- Trailing P/E is 36.95x and price-to-sales is 3.87x.
- Analyst DCF (FMP) is $256 with margin of safety at -1.94%.
- Five-year revenue CAGR is 8.13% and five-year EPS CAGR is 25.77%.
- Earnings yield is 2.71% and net margin is 10.52%.
Valuation Setup
The market price, model anchor, growth support, and profitability facts behind the valuation read.
Evaluating the Earnings Multiple and Its Fundamental Support
When assessing the investment profile of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation, analysts must determine whether the market's current appraisal is backed by sufficient operational momentum. As of July 10, 2026, the stock closed at $261, which places its trailing price-to-earnings ratio at 36.95x. This multiple must be weighed against an independent analyst-DCF (FMP) reference price of $256, yielding a margin of safety of -1.94%.
Relying on a single valuation multiple often obscures the underlying business dynamics. This analysis examines the stock's P/E ratio, sales multiple, earnings yield, and historical growth rates as an integrated framework. If these financial indicators move in tandem, the current market valuation gains credibility; conversely, any divergence suggests that investors should approach the equity with caution.
Analyzing the Market Price Against Sales and Earnings Yield
To understand what investors are paying for the business, we examine the market price alongside key valuation ratios. The equity commands a price-to-sales ratio of 3.87x, which corresponds to an earnings yield of 2.71%. Looking at the trailing sales multiple in conjunction with historical P/E ranges provides a more complete picture of the market's pricing trends than focusing on the headline earnings multiple alone.
WAB P/E ratio Chart
The trailing earnings multiple is the main valuation exhibit because it connects the market price to reported earnings.
Latest P/E ratio: 36.95x as of July 10, 2026.
A P/E ratio of 36.95x has to be judged against the company's five-year EPS CAGR of 25.77%. If the multiple is high while EPS support is ordinary, the valuation thesis becomes more dependent on investor confidence than on fresh earnings power.
WAB price-to-sales Chart
Price-to-sales gives a second valuation lens when margins and earnings can move around the cycle.
Latest price-to-sales ratio: 3.87x.
Price-to-sales at 3.87x is most useful beside net margin of 10.52%. A richer sales multiple is easier to defend when margin quality is durable rather than temporarily elevated.
The Analyst DCF Benchmark and the Margin of Safety
An independent valuation benchmark offers a useful comparison to the prevailing market price. The third-party analyst DCF (FMP) model calculates a fair value of $256 for the company, resulting in a margin of safety of -1.94%. This suggests the stock is trading roughly in line with its estimated intrinsic value. This figure should be treated as a single input among many, and readers can explore alternative projection ranges on our dedicated DCF page.
The valuation at a glance
Each input on its own line: what the stock costs against earnings and sales, the model's fair value and how far price sits from it, and the growth and margins behind the business.
WAB earnings yield Chart
Earnings yield reframes valuation from an owner's-yield perspective rather than a multiple perspective.
Latest earnings yield: 2.71%.
The earnings yield of 2.71% is the counterweight to the P/E ratio. If the yield is thin relative to the quality and growth profile, the valuation case needs more help from future compounding.
Assessing Long-Term Revenue and Net Income Expansion
For a premium valuation multiple to remain sustainable, the business must demonstrate consistent expansion. Over the past five years, the company achieved a revenue compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.13%, while its five-year EPS CAGR reached 25.77%. Comparing these top-line and bottom-line expansion rates helps clarify whether the current share price is supported by actual business growth or if it is primarily driven by multiple expansion.
WAB revenue
Revenue history tests whether the valuation is being supported by real business expansion.
Five-year revenue CAGR: 8.13%. This is endpoint-to-endpoint from the fiscal years shown — a depressed start year can inflate it, so read it against the recent bars.
Revenue growth is the business-expansion evidence behind the valuation read. A five-year revenue CAGR of 8.13% helps show how much of the valuation story is coming from company growth instead of only multiple expansion.
WAB EPS
EPS history checks whether reported earnings are keeping pace with the market multiple.
Five-year EPS CAGR: 25.77%. This is endpoint-to-endpoint from the fiscal years shown — a depressed or negative start year can inflate it, so read it against the recent bars.
A five-year EPS CAGR of 25.77% is the clearest support figure for a P/E-based conclusion. If EPS growth slows while the multiple remains elevated, the article should become more cautious after refresh.
Profitability Quality as a Defense for the Sales Multiple
Operating efficiency serves as the critical link between top-line sales and net shareholder returns. The company currently generates a net profit margin of 10.52% against its price-to-sales ratio of 3.87x. Higher sales multiples are generally more defensible when supported by durable profit margins. However, if profitability is currently near cyclical highs, the valuation could face downward pressure if margins begin to normalize.
WAB net margin
Net margin shows whether the company has enough profitability quality to support its valuation.
Net margin (TTM): 10.52%. The bars below are annual fiscal years.
Net margin of 10.52% is a quality signal, not a valuation verdict by itself. It matters because a premium multiple is more defensible when margins are structurally strong and less defensible when margins are peaking.
The Balance of Growth Support Against Multiple Compression
The optimistic case for the stock relies on the continuation of its robust five-year EPS CAGR of 25.77% and a healthy net margin of 10.52% to sustain current valuation levels. On the other hand, the cautious view highlights that a trailing P/E of 36.95x leaves little room for error. If revenue growth falls below the historical rate of 8.13%, the stock could experience significant multiple compression.
Bull and bear case
Valuation support
- Five-year revenue CAGR of 8.13% and five-year EPS CAGR of 25.77% support the business case.
- Net margin of 10.52% is the quality check behind the multiple.
Valuation pressure
- A P/E ratio of 36.95x can become demanding if EPS growth slows.
- The analyst-DCF (FMP) margin of safety at -1.94% should change the valuation read if it deteriorates after refresh.
Key Operational Metrics to Monitor for a Shift in Outlook
Several developments could alter the current valuation perspective. A significant divergence in the market price from the analyst-DCF (FMP) reference of $256 would directly impact the margin of safety. Additionally, any deterioration in the five-year EPS CAGR or a contraction in the net margin below 10.52% would signal that the business is no longer supporting its market premium.
Synthesizing the Valuation Framework and Business Fundamentals
In summary, evaluating Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation requires aligning its market price with its underlying financial health. The current valuation structure relies on the company maintaining its historical growth trajectory and solid profit margins. The metrics presented in this analysis are updated daily from reported financial statements to ensure accuracy, providing general fundamental context rather than personalized financial advice.
FAQ
Is WAB fairly valued?
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation trades at 36.95x trailing earnings with an analyst-DCF (FMP) margin of safety of -1.94%. The cleanest read comes from comparing that valuation to five-year revenue CAGR of 8.13% and five-year EPS CAGR of 25.77%.
What valuation metric matters most for WAB?
This article anchors on P/E, fair value, margin of safety, price-to-sales, earnings yield, revenue growth, and EPS growth. No single metric is treated as a recommendation.
How often should this WAB valuation view refresh?
We refresh this note after each daily market close, so the price, fair value, and every figure stay current. Numbers here are as of July 10, 2026.
What would change our mind
- A material move away from the analyst-DCF (FMP) reference of $256.
- A break in five-year EPS support, currently 25.77%.
- Margin quality drifting away from the latest net margin of 10.52%.
The bottom line
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation valuation research note from TGMCharts Research, grounded in precomputed fundamentals, chart exhibits, and a frozen claim ledger.
Read next: WAB fundamentalsContinue with Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation's full stock page.How we checked this researchShowHide
Data snapshot · By TGMCharts Research.
Every number in this note comes from data we compute and store ourselves from the company's reported figures, plus verbatim excerpts from its SEC filings. When a value isn't available we say so — we never fill gaps with estimates.
Latest filing excerpt
10-Q · filed 2026-04-22 · period 2026-03-31 · SEC EDGAR source
- “Organic sales increased $60 million which was attributable to both the Freight and Transit Segments.”
- “Sales from acquisitions contributed $225 million, and favorable changes in foreign exchange increased Net sales by $68 million.”
- “Selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A") increased $94 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025.”
- “Engineering expenses increased $10 million and Amortization expense increased $14 million both due to incremental expense from acquisitions.”
Source pages
Exhibit sources
Research trail
Every number, checked
Every numeric or dated claim in this note was checked against our stored company data before publishing — each figure below links to the page it comes from.