United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL) vs Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB)
UAL leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of United Airlines Holdings, Inc. and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
UAL
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
$119.97Industrials
WAB
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
$268.89Industrials
Total return — UAL vs WAB
growth of $100 · last 20yUAL +280.0%WAB +1580.6%WAB compounded faster
UAL WAB
UAL vs WAB: by the numbers
- •WAB is the larger company ($45.62B vs $38.94B market cap).
- •UAL trades at the lower earnings multiple (10.71 vs 38.03 P/E).
- •WAB converts more revenue to profit (10.52% vs 6.06% net margin).
- •UAL grew revenue faster over the past five years (41.67% vs 9.07% CAGR).
- •WAB pays a dividend (0.42% yield) while UAL does not currently pay one.
Which is better, UAL or WAB?
Metric tally: UAL 11 · WAB 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueUAL(lower P/E)
GrowthUAL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityWAB(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | UAL | WAB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 10.71● | 38.03 |
| Forward P/E | 8.32● | 25.33 |
| P/S ratio | 0.65● | 3.99 |
| P/B ratio | 2.47● | 4.12 |
| PEG ratio | 1.66● | 2.32 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.17● | 22.57 |
| FCF yield | 8.18%● | 3.58% |
Profitability
| Metric | UAL | WAB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 64.24%● | 33.81% |
| Operating margin | 8.44% | 16.10%● |
| Net margin | 6.06% | 10.52%● |
| ROE | 23.09%● | 10.85% |
| ROIC | 6.63% | 7.64%● |
Dividends
| Metric | UAL | WAB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.42% |
| Payout ratio | — | 16.33% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | UAL | WAB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 41.67%● | 9.07% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.15% | 25.77%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 61.78%● | 9.83% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 16.76% | 28.01%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, UAL or WAB?
- It depends on your goal. value: UAL (lower P/E); growth: UAL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: WAB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UAL leads 11 to 5.
- Is UAL or WAB cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, UAL is cheaper: UAL trades at a 10.71 P/E and WAB at 38.03.
- Which has grown faster, UAL or WAB?
- Over the past five years, UAL grew revenue faster — UAL at a 41.67% CAGR versus WAB at 9.07%.
- Does UAL or WAB pay a bigger dividend?
- WAB pays a dividend (0.42% yield) while UAL does not currently pay one.
- Is UAL or WAB more profitable?
- WAB runs the higher net margin — UAL at 6.06% versus WAB at 10.52%.
- Which has been the better investment, UAL or WAB?
- Over the past 10-year, WAB delivered the higher annualized total return — UAL at 10.84% versus WAB at 14.54%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
United Airlines P/E ratioWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies P/E ratioUnited Airlines dividend yieldWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies dividend yieldUnited Airlines ROEWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies ROEUnited Airlines operating marginWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies operating marginUnited Airlines revenue growthWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies revenue growthUnited Airlines free cash flowWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies free cash flow
United Airlines & Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.