Which has the lower trailing P/E, SYF or WTW?

SYF has the lower trailing P/E: SYF trades at 8.06 and WTW at 20.01. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, SYF or WTW?

Over the past five years, SYF grew revenue faster — SYF at a 10.25% CAGR versus WTW at 2.38%.

Does SYF or WTW pay a bigger dividend?

SYF yields 1.58% and WTW yields 1.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is SYF or WTW more profitable?

SYF runs the higher net margin — SYF at 18.56% versus WTW at 15.49%.

How have SYF and WTW total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, SYF delivered 13.78% and WTW delivered 11.54% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Synchrony Financial (SYF) vs Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW)

A side-by-side comparison of Synchrony Financial and Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 9, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

SYF

Synchrony Financial

$25.17B

$77.35Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 9, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

WTW

Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company

$29.14B

$313.72Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 9, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — SYF vs WTW

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

SYF +269.3% (+14.0%/yr)WTW +201.4% (+11.7%/yr)SYF compounded faster over this window

SYF WTW

SYF vs WTW: by the numbers

•WTW is the larger company ($29.14B vs $25.17B market cap).
•SYF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.06 vs 20.01 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•SYF converts more revenue to profit (18.56% vs 15.49% net margin).
•SYF grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.25% vs 2.38% CAGR).
•SYF pays the higher dividend yield (1.58% vs 1.16%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	SYF	WTW
P/E ratio	8.06	20.01
Forward P/E	8.41	16.40
P/S ratio	1.39	3.03
P/B ratio	1.55	3.98

Profitability

Metric	SYF	WTW
Gross margin	52.26%	42.06%
Operating margin	24.34%	22.23%
Net margin	18.56%	15.49%
ROE	20.82%	20.36%

Dividends

Metric	SYF	WTW
Dividend yield	1.58%	1.16%
Payout ratio	12.70%	23.12%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	SYF	WTW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.25%	2.38%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	32.61%	16.30%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	13.98%	9.01%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, SYF or WTW?: SYF has the lower trailing P/E: SYF trades at 8.06 and WTW at 20.01. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, SYF or WTW?: Over the past five years, SYF grew revenue faster — SYF at a 10.25% CAGR versus WTW at 2.38%.
Does SYF or WTW pay a bigger dividend?: SYF yields 1.58% and WTW yields 1.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is SYF or WTW more profitable?: SYF runs the higher net margin — SYF at 18.56% versus WTW at 15.49%.
How have SYF and WTW total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, SYF delivered 13.78% and WTW delivered 11.54% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full SYF analysis Full WTW analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Synchrony Financial P/E ratio Willis Towers Watson Public P/E ratio Synchrony Financial dividend yield Willis Towers Watson Public dividend yield Synchrony Financial ROE Willis Towers Watson Public ROE Synchrony Financial operating margin Willis Towers Watson Public operating margin Synchrony Financial revenue growth Willis Towers Watson Public revenue growth

Synchrony Financial & Willis Towers Watson Public appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 9, 2026.