The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) vs Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)
SCHW and WFC are evenly matched — 7 metrics each of 14.
A side-by-side comparison of The Charles Schwab Corporation and Wells Fargo & Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
SCHW
The Charles Schwab Corporation
$91.10Financial Services
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
$83.73Financial Services
Total return — SCHW vs WFC
growth of $100 · last 30ySCHW +2382.3%WFC +863.5%SCHW compounded faster
SCHW WFC
SCHW vs WFC: by the numbers
- •WFC is the larger company ($256.26B vs $158.44B market cap).
- •WFC trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.82 vs 18.08 P/E).
- •SCHW converts more revenue to profit (33.26% vs 17.29% net margin).
- •SCHW grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.85% vs 9.46% CAGR).
- •WFC pays the higher dividend yield (2.15% vs 1.30%).
Which is better, SCHW or WFC?
Metric tally: SCHW 7 · WFC 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueWFC(lower P/E)
GrowthSCHW(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeWFC(higher dividend yield)
QualitySCHW(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | SCHW | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 18.08 | 12.82● |
| Forward P/E | 12.44 | 11.96● |
| P/S ratio | 5.63 | 2.14● |
| P/B ratio | 3.24 | 1.51● |
| PEG ratio | 0.36● | 0.79 |
Profitability
| Metric | SCHW | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 87.57%● | 64.55% |
| Operating margin | 43.04%● | 20.47% |
| Net margin | 33.26%● | 17.29% |
| ROE | 19.14%● | 12.18% |
| ROIC | 9.50%● | 3.16% |
Dividends
| Metric | SCHW | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.30% | 2.15%● |
| Payout ratio | 25.21% | 28.17% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | SCHW | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.85%● | 9.46% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.05% | 72.38%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.66% | 15.64%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, SCHW or WFC?
- It depends on your goal. value: WFC (lower P/E); growth: SCHW (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WFC (higher dividend yield); quality: SCHW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is SCHW or WFC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WFC is cheaper: SCHW trades at a 18.08 P/E and WFC at 12.82.
- Which has grown faster, SCHW or WFC?
- Over the past five years, SCHW grew revenue faster — SCHW at a 14.85% CAGR versus WFC at 9.46%.
- Does SCHW or WFC pay a bigger dividend?
- SCHW yields 1.30% and WFC yields 2.15% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is SCHW or WFC more profitable?
- SCHW runs the higher net margin — SCHW at 33.26% versus WFC at 17.29%.
- Which has been the better investment, SCHW or WFC?
- Over the past 10-year, SCHW delivered the higher annualized total return — SCHW at 13.78% versus WFC at 8.61%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Charles Schwab P/E ratioWells Fargo & P/E ratioCharles Schwab dividend yieldWells Fargo & dividend yieldCharles Schwab ROEWells Fargo & ROECharles Schwab operating marginWells Fargo & operating marginCharles Schwab revenue growthWells Fargo & revenue growthCharles Schwab free cash flowWells Fargo & free cash flow
Charles Schwab & Wells Fargo & appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.