Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF) vs W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB)
RJF leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics, though WRB is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Raymond James Financial, Inc. and W. R. Berkley Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 21, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
RJF
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
$155.86Financial Services
WRB
W. R. Berkley Corporation
$67.18Financial Services
Total return — RJF vs WRB
growth of $100 · last 30yRJF +5095.3%WRB +3996.3%RJF compounded faster
RJF WRB
RJF vs WRB: by the numbers
- •RJF is the larger company ($30.37B vs $25.01B market cap).
- •WRB trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.23 vs 14.72 P/E).
- •RJF converts more revenue to profit (13.13% vs 12.64% net margin).
- •RJF grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.83% vs 11.95% CAGR).
- •WRB pays the higher dividend yield (2.77% vs 1.33%).
Which is better, RJF or WRB?
Metric tally: RJF 8 · WRB 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueWRB(lower P/E)
GrowthRJF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeWRB(higher dividend yield)
QualityRJF(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | RJF | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.72 | 14.23● |
| Forward P/E | 13.12● | 14.35 |
| P/S ratio | 1.90 | 1.79● |
| P/B ratio | 2.47● | 2.72 |
| PEG ratio | 2.76● | 7.63 |
Profitability
| Metric | RJF | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 89.16%● | 26.14% |
| Operating margin | 16.86%● | 16.24% |
| Net margin | 13.13%● | 12.64% |
| ROE | 17.08% | 19.27%● |
| ROIC | 15.88%● | 10.42% |
Dividends
| Metric | RJF | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.33% | 2.77%● |
| Payout ratio | 19.75% | 41.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | RJF | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 13.83%● | 11.95% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 21.61% | 28.88%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 15.14% | 18.11%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, RJF or WRB?
- It depends on your goal. value: WRB (lower P/E); growth: RJF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WRB (higher dividend yield); quality: RJF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RJF leads 8 to 6.
- Is RJF or WRB cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WRB is cheaper: RJF trades at a 14.72 P/E and WRB at 14.23.
- Which has grown faster, RJF or WRB?
- Over the past five years, RJF grew revenue faster — RJF at a 13.83% CAGR versus WRB at 11.95%.
- Does RJF or WRB pay a bigger dividend?
- RJF yields 1.33% and WRB yields 2.77% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is RJF or WRB more profitable?
- RJF runs the higher net margin — RJF at 13.13% versus WRB at 12.64%.
- Which has been the better investment, RJF or WRB?
- Over the past 10-year, RJF delivered the higher annualized total return — RJF at 17.93% versus WRB at 17.16%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Raymond James Financial P/E ratioW. R. Berkley P/E ratioRaymond James Financial dividend yieldW. R. Berkley dividend yieldRaymond James Financial ROEW. R. Berkley ROERaymond James Financial operating marginW. R. Berkley operating marginRaymond James Financial revenue growthW. R. Berkley revenue growthRaymond James Financial free cash flowW. R. Berkley free cash flow
Raymond James Financial & W. R. Berkley appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 21, 2026.