Which has the lower trailing P/E, RF or WTW?

RF has the lower trailing P/E: RF trades at 12.76 and WTW at 18.45. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, RF or WTW?

Over the past five years, RF grew revenue faster — RF at a 7.34% CAGR versus WTW at 1.91%.

Does RF or WTW pay a bigger dividend?

RF yields 3.39% and WTW yields 1.19% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is RF or WTW more profitable?

RF runs the higher net margin — RF at 23.33% versus WTW at 16.84%.

How have RF and WTW total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, RF delivered 17.24% and WTW delivered 11.37% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Regions Financial Corporation (RF) vs Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW)

A side-by-side comparison of Regions Financial Corporation and Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Regions Financial Corporation

$26.40B

$30.94Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

WTW

Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company

$29.84B

$315.93Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — RF vs WTW

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 25y

RF +225.6%WTW +1095.3%WTW compounded faster

RF WTW

RF vs WTW: by the numbers

•WTW is the larger company ($29.84B vs $26.40B market cap).
•RF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.76 vs 18.45 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•RF converts more revenue to profit (23.33% vs 16.84% net margin).
•RF grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.34% vs 1.91% CAGR).
•RF pays the higher dividend yield (3.39% vs 1.19%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	RF	WTW
P/E ratio	12.76	18.45
Forward P/E	11.89	16.21
P/S ratio	2.80	3.06
P/B ratio	1.42	3.80
PEG ratio	0.62	1.13

Profitability

Metric	RF	WTW
Gross margin	76.85%	38.16%
Operating margin	29.77%	22.73%
Net margin	23.33%	16.84%
ROE	11.85%	20.90%
ROIC	13.79%	11.52%

Dividends

Metric	RF	WTW
Dividend yield	3.39%	1.19%
Payout ratio	45.89%	23.01%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	RF	WTW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.34%	1.91%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	17.53%	16.30%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	14.62%	10.89%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, RF or WTW?: RF has the lower trailing P/E: RF trades at 12.76 and WTW at 18.45. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, RF or WTW?: Over the past five years, RF grew revenue faster — RF at a 7.34% CAGR versus WTW at 1.91%.
Does RF or WTW pay a bigger dividend?: RF yields 3.39% and WTW yields 1.19% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is RF or WTW more profitable?: RF runs the higher net margin — RF at 23.33% versus WTW at 16.84%.
How have RF and WTW total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, RF delivered 17.24% and WTW delivered 11.37% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full RF analysis Full WTW analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Regions Financial P/E ratio Willis Towers Watson Public P/E ratio Regions Financial dividend yield Willis Towers Watson Public dividend yield Regions Financial ROE Willis Towers Watson Public ROE Regions Financial operating margin Willis Towers Watson Public operating margin Regions Financial revenue growth Willis Towers Watson Public revenue growth Regions Financial free cash flow Willis Towers Watson Public free cash flow

Regions Financial & Willis Towers Watson Public appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 29, 2026.