Is RF or WTW cheaper?

On trailing earnings, RF is cheaper: RF trades at a 12.20 P/E and WTW at 15.32.

Which has grown faster, RF or WTW?

Over the past five years, RF grew revenue faster — RF at a 7.48% CAGR versus WTW at 1.91%.

Does RF or WTW pay a bigger dividend?

RF yields 3.62% and WTW yields 1.42% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is RF or WTW more profitable?

RF runs the higher net margin — RF at 23.13% versus WTW at 16.84%.

Which has been the better investment, RF or WTW?

Over the past 10-year, RF delivered the higher annualized total return — RF at 16.01% versus WTW at 9.04%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Regions Financial Corporation (RF) vs Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW)

RF leads on 12 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Regions Financial Corporation and Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Regions Financial Corporation

$24.98B

$29.27Financial Services

WTW

Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company

$24.80B

$262.63Financial Services

Total return — RF vs WTW

growth of $100 · last 25y

RF +18.5%WTW +497.3%WTW compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

RF WTW

RF vs WTW: by the numbers

•RF is the larger company ($24.98B vs $24.80B market cap).
•RF trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.20 vs 15.32 P/E).
•RF converts more revenue to profit (23.13% vs 16.84% net margin).
•RF grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.48% vs 1.91% CAGR).
•RF pays the higher dividend yield (3.62% vs 1.42%).

Which is better, RF or WTW?

Metric tally: RF 12 · WTW 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueRF(lower P/E)

GrowthRF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeRF(higher dividend yield)

QualityRF(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	RF	WTW
P/E ratio	12.20●	15.32
Forward P/E	11.19●	13.44
P/S ratio	2.64	2.54●
P/B ratio	1.35●	3.15
PEG ratio	0.58●	0.94

Profitability

Metric	RF	WTW
Gross margin	75.81%●	38.16%
Operating margin	29.48%●	22.73%
Net margin	23.13%●	16.84%
ROE	11.85%	20.90%●
ROIC	13.79%●	11.52%

Dividends

Metric	RF	WTW
Dividend yield	3.62%●	1.42%
Payout ratio	45.89%	22.77%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	RF	WTW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.48%●	1.91%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	17.53%●	16.30%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	10.80%●	1.67%

Frequently asked

Which is better, RF or WTW?: It depends on your goal. value: RF (lower P/E); growth: RF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: RF (higher dividend yield); quality: RF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RF leads 12 to 2.
Is RF or WTW cheaper?: On trailing earnings, RF is cheaper: RF trades at a 12.20 P/E and WTW at 15.32.
Which has grown faster, RF or WTW?: Over the past five years, RF grew revenue faster — RF at a 7.48% CAGR versus WTW at 1.91%.
Does RF or WTW pay a bigger dividend?: RF yields 3.62% and WTW yields 1.42% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is RF or WTW more profitable?: RF runs the higher net margin — RF at 23.13% versus WTW at 16.84%.
Which has been the better investment, RF or WTW?: Over the past 10-year, RF delivered the higher annualized total return — RF at 16.01% versus WTW at 9.04%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full RF analysis Full WTW analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Regions Financial P/E ratio Willis Towers Watson Public P/E ratio Regions Financial dividend yield Willis Towers Watson Public dividend yield Regions Financial ROE Willis Towers Watson Public ROE Regions Financial operating margin Willis Towers Watson Public operating margin Regions Financial revenue growth Willis Towers Watson Public revenue growth Regions Financial free cash flow Willis Towers Watson Public free cash flow

Regions Financial & Willis Towers Watson Public appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.