Which has the lower trailing P/E, RF or WRB?

RF has the lower trailing P/E: RF trades at 12.30 and WRB at 14.35. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, RF or WRB?

Over the past five years, WRB grew revenue faster — RF at a 7.34% CAGR versus WRB at 15.38%.

Does RF or WRB pay a bigger dividend?

RF yields 3.63% and WRB yields 2.67% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is RF or WRB more profitable?

RF runs the higher net margin — RF at 23.33% versus WRB at 10.71%.

How have RF and WRB total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, RF delivered 16.01% and WRB delivered 17.76% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Regions Financial Corporation (RF) vs W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB)

A side-by-side comparison of Regions Financial Corporation and W. R. Berkley Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Regions Financial Corporation

$25.71B

$30.13Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

WRB

W. R. Berkley Corporation

$26.02B

$69.90Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — RF vs WRB

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

RF +359.1% (+16.5%/yr)WRB +398.1% (+17.4%/yr)WRB compounded faster over this window

RF WRB

RF vs WRB: by the numbers

•WRB is the larger company ($26.02B vs $25.71B market cap).
•RF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.30 vs 14.35 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•RF converts more revenue to profit (23.33% vs 10.71% net margin).
•WRB grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.38% vs 7.34% CAGR).
•RF pays the higher dividend yield (3.63% vs 2.67%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	RF	WRB
P/E ratio	12.30	14.35
Forward P/E	11.41	14.34
P/S ratio	2.69	1.45
P/B ratio	1.36	2.55

Profitability

Metric	RF	WRB
Gross margin	76.85%	19.81%
Operating margin	29.77%	13.69%
Net margin	23.33%	10.71%
ROE	11.85%	18.89%

Dividends

Metric	RF	WRB
Dividend yield	3.63%	2.67%
Payout ratio	44.69%	38.40%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	RF	WRB
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.34%	15.38%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	17.53%	28.88%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	13.70%	19.50%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, RF or WRB?: RF has the lower trailing P/E: RF trades at 12.30 and WRB at 14.35. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, RF or WRB?: Over the past five years, WRB grew revenue faster — RF at a 7.34% CAGR versus WRB at 15.38%.
Does RF or WRB pay a bigger dividend?: RF yields 3.63% and WRB yields 2.67% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is RF or WRB more profitable?: RF runs the higher net margin — RF at 23.33% versus WRB at 10.71%.
How have RF and WRB total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, RF delivered 16.01% and WRB delivered 17.76% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full RF analysis Full WRB analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Regions Financial P/E ratio W. R. Berkley P/E ratio Regions Financial dividend yield W. R. Berkley dividend yield Regions Financial ROE W. R. Berkley ROE Regions Financial operating margin W. R. Berkley operating margin Regions Financial revenue growth W. R. Berkley revenue growth

Regions Financial & W. R. Berkley appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.