Is RF or WRB cheaper?

On trailing earnings, RF is cheaper: RF trades at a 12.20 P/E and WRB at 14.46.

Which has grown faster, RF or WRB?

Over the past five years, WRB grew revenue faster — RF at a 7.48% CAGR versus WRB at 11.95%.

Does RF or WRB pay a bigger dividend?

RF yields 3.62% and WRB yields 2.72% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is RF or WRB more profitable?

RF runs the higher net margin — RF at 23.13% versus WRB at 12.64%.

Which has been the better investment, RF or WRB?

Over the past 10-year, WRB delivered the higher annualized total return — RF at 16.01% versus WRB at 17.34%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Regions Financial Corporation (RF) vs W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB)

RF leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Regions Financial Corporation and W. R. Berkley Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Regions Financial Corporation

$24.98B

$29.27Financial Services

WRB

W. R. Berkley Corporation

$25.42B

$68.27Financial Services

Total return — RF vs WRB

growth of $100 · last 30y

RF +54.5%WRB +4012.7%WRB compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

RF WRB

RF vs WRB: by the numbers

•WRB is the larger company ($25.42B vs $24.98B market cap).
•RF trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.20 vs 14.46 P/E).
•RF converts more revenue to profit (23.13% vs 12.64% net margin).
•WRB grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.95% vs 7.48% CAGR).
•RF pays the higher dividend yield (3.62% vs 2.72%).

Which is better, RF or WRB?

Metric tally: RF 9 · WRB 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueRF(lower P/E)

GrowthWRB(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeRF(higher dividend yield)

QualityRF(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	RF	WRB
P/E ratio	12.20●	14.46
Forward P/E	11.19●	14.58
P/S ratio	2.64	1.82●
P/B ratio	1.35●	2.77
PEG ratio	0.58●	7.63

Profitability

Metric	RF	WRB
Gross margin	75.81%●	26.14%
Operating margin	29.48%●	16.24%
Net margin	23.13%●	12.64%
ROE	11.85%	19.27%●
ROIC	13.79%●	10.42%

Dividends

Metric	RF	WRB
Dividend yield	3.62%●	2.72%
Payout ratio	45.89%	41.52%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	RF	WRB
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.48%	11.95%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	17.53%	28.88%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	10.80%	17.46%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, RF or WRB?: It depends on your goal. value: RF (lower P/E); growth: WRB (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: RF (higher dividend yield); quality: RF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RF leads 9 to 5.
Is RF or WRB cheaper?: On trailing earnings, RF is cheaper: RF trades at a 12.20 P/E and WRB at 14.46.
Which has grown faster, RF or WRB?: Over the past five years, WRB grew revenue faster — RF at a 7.48% CAGR versus WRB at 11.95%.
Does RF or WRB pay a bigger dividend?: RF yields 3.62% and WRB yields 2.72% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is RF or WRB more profitable?: RF runs the higher net margin — RF at 23.13% versus WRB at 12.64%.
Which has been the better investment, RF or WRB?: Over the past 10-year, WRB delivered the higher annualized total return — RF at 16.01% versus WRB at 17.34%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full RF analysis Full WRB analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Regions Financial P/E ratio W. R. Berkley P/E ratio Regions Financial dividend yield W. R. Berkley dividend yield Regions Financial ROE W. R. Berkley ROE Regions Financial operating margin W. R. Berkley operating margin Regions Financial revenue growth W. R. Berkley revenue growth Regions Financial free cash flow W. R. Berkley free cash flow

Regions Financial & W. R. Berkley appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.