Which has the lower trailing P/E, QUMS or SFBC?

SFBC has the lower trailing P/E: QUMS trades at 57.43 and SFBC at 14.50. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Does QUMS or SFBC pay a bigger dividend?

SFBC pays a dividend (1.84% yield), while QUMS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is QUMS or SFBC more profitable?

SFBC runs the higher net margin — QUMS at 0.00% versus SFBC at 12.93%.

Quantumsphere Acquisition Corp. Ordinary Shares (QUMS) vs Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. (SFBC)

A side-by-side comparison of Quantumsphere Acquisition Corp. Ordinary Shares and Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

QUMS

Quantumsphere Acquisition Corp. Ordinary Shares

$113M

$10.36Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:42 PM EDT

SFBC

Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.

$108M

$45.23Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:18 PM EDT

Total return — QUMS vs SFBC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1y

QUMS +3.9% (+3.9%/yr)SFBC -5.4% (-5.4%/yr)QUMS compounded faster over this window

QUMS SFBC

QUMS vs SFBC: by the numbers

•QUMS is the larger company ($113M vs $108M market cap).
•SFBC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.50 vs 57.43 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•SFBC is profitable (12.93% net margin) while QUMS runs a net loss (0.00%).
•SFBC pays a dividend (1.84% yield), while QUMS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	QUMS	SFBC
P/E ratio	57.43	14.50
P/S ratio	N/A	1.73
P/B ratio	1.38	0.96

Profitability

Metric	QUMS	SFBC
Gross margin	0.00%	N/A
Operating margin	0.00%	15.70%
Net margin	0.00%	12.93%
ROE	1.91%	7.14%
ROIC	-1.45%	N/A

Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.

Dividends

Metric	QUMS	SFBC
Dividend yield	N/A	1.84%
Payout ratio	N/A	26.28%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	QUMS	SFBC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	N/A	7.35%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-4.09%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	N/A	0.94%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, QUMS or SFBC?: SFBC has the lower trailing P/E: QUMS trades at 57.43 and SFBC at 14.50. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Does QUMS or SFBC pay a bigger dividend?: SFBC pays a dividend (1.84% yield), while QUMS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is QUMS or SFBC more profitable?: SFBC runs the higher net margin — QUMS at 0.00% versus SFBC at 12.93%.

Go deeper

Full QUMS analysis Full SFBC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Quantumsphere Acquisition Corp. Ordinary Shares P/E ratio Sound Financial Bancorp P/E ratio Sound Financial Bancorp dividend yield Quantumsphere Acquisition Corp. Ordinary Shares ROE Sound Financial Bancorp ROE Quantumsphere Acquisition Corp. Ordinary Shares operating margin Sound Financial Bancorp operating margin Quantumsphere Acquisition Corp. Ordinary Shares revenue growth Sound Financial Bancorp revenue growth Quantumsphere Acquisition Corp. Ordinary Shares free cash flow

Quantumsphere Acquisition Corp. Ordinary Shares & Sound Financial Bancorp appear in these rankings

Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.