Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG) vs W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB)
WRB leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Principal Financial Group, Inc. and W. R. Berkley Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
PFG
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
$111.12Financial Services
WRB
W. R. Berkley Corporation
$68.27Financial Services
Total return — PFG vs WRB
growth of $100 · last 25yPFG +429.1%WRB +2020.2%WRB compounded faster
PFG WRB
PFG vs WRB: by the numbers
- •WRB is the larger company ($25.42B vs $24.00B market cap).
- •WRB trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.46 vs 15.92 P/E).
- •WRB converts more revenue to profit (12.64% vs 10.03% net margin).
- •WRB grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.95% vs 2.90% CAGR).
- •PFG pays the higher dividend yield (2.87% vs 2.72%).
Which is better, PFG or WRB?
Metric tally: PFG 5 · WRB 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueWRB(lower P/E)
GrowthWRB(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomePFG(higher dividend yield)
QualityWRB(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | PFG | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 15.92 | 14.46● |
| Forward P/E | 11.91● | 14.58 |
| P/S ratio | 1.58● | 1.82 |
| P/B ratio | 2.07● | 2.77 |
| PEG ratio | 17.12 | 7.63● |
Profitability
| Metric | PFG | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.68%● | 26.14% |
| Operating margin | 12.36% | 16.24%● |
| Net margin | 10.03% | 12.64%● |
| ROE | 13.12% | 19.27%● |
| ROIC | 0.37% | 10.42%● |
Dividends
| Metric | PFG | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.87%● | 2.72% |
| Payout ratio | 59.96% | 41.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PFG | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.90% | 11.95%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.93% | 28.88%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 15.40% | 17.46%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, PFG or WRB?
- It depends on your goal. value: WRB (lower P/E); growth: WRB (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PFG (higher dividend yield); quality: WRB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WRB leads 9 to 5.
- Is PFG or WRB cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WRB is cheaper: PFG trades at a 15.92 P/E and WRB at 14.46.
- Which has grown faster, PFG or WRB?
- Over the past five years, WRB grew revenue faster — PFG at a 2.90% CAGR versus WRB at 11.95%.
- Does PFG or WRB pay a bigger dividend?
- PFG yields 2.87% and WRB yields 2.72% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is PFG or WRB more profitable?
- WRB runs the higher net margin — PFG at 10.03% versus WRB at 12.64%.
- Which has been the better investment, PFG or WRB?
- Over the past 10-year, WRB delivered the higher annualized total return — PFG at 14.26% versus WRB at 17.34%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Principal Financial P/E ratioW. R. Berkley P/E ratioPrincipal Financial dividend yieldW. R. Berkley dividend yieldPrincipal Financial ROEW. R. Berkley ROEPrincipal Financial operating marginW. R. Berkley operating marginPrincipal Financial revenue growthW. R. Berkley revenue growthPrincipal Financial free cash flowW. R. Berkley free cash flow
Principal Financial & W. R. Berkley appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.