Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)
PAYC leads on 9 of 11 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Paycom Software, Inc. and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
PAYC
Paycom Software, Inc.
$147.94TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 17, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
WULF
TeraWulf Inc.
$18.16TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 17, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — PAYC vs WULF
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 12yPAYC +905.6%WULF -10.2%PAYC compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
PAYC WULF
PAYC vs WULF: by the numbers
- •WULF is the larger company ($9.00B vs $8.07B market cap).
- •PAYC is profitable (22.44% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-611.46%).
- •WULF grew revenue faster over the past five years (66.83% vs 19.16% CAGR).
- •PAYC pays a dividend (1.00% yield) while WULF does not currently pay one.
Which is better, PAYC or WULF?
Metric tally: PAYC 9 · WULF 2It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthWULF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityPAYC(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | PAYC | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 17.40 | — |
| Forward P/E | 13.81 | — |
| P/S ratio | 3.68● | 45.25 |
| P/B ratio | 9.49● | 50.90 |
| PEG ratio | 0.65 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.66 | — |
| FCF yield | 5.74% | — |
Profitability
| Metric | PAYC | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 79.74%● | 50.93% |
| Operating margin | 28.30%● | -101.10% |
| Net margin | 22.44%● | -611.46% |
| ROE | 57.87%● | -470.94% |
| ROIC | 18.38%● | -3.18% |
Dividends
| Metric | PAYC | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | — |
| Payout ratio | 18.45% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PAYC | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 19.16% | 66.83%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 26.70%● | -27.04% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 25.72%● | -2.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -16.17% | 3.12%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, PAYC or WULF?
- It depends on your goal. growth: WULF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: PAYC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PAYC leads 9 to 2.
- Which has grown faster, PAYC or WULF?
- Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — PAYC at a 19.16% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.
- Does PAYC or WULF pay a bigger dividend?
- PAYC pays a dividend (1.00% yield) while WULF does not currently pay one.
- Is PAYC or WULF more profitable?
- PAYC runs the higher net margin — PAYC at 22.44% versus WULF at -611.46%.
- Which has been the better investment, PAYC or WULF?
- Over the past 10-year, PAYC delivered the higher annualized total return — PAYC at 12.82% versus WULF at 6.36%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Paycom Software P/E ratioTeraWulf P/E ratioPaycom Software dividend yieldTeraWulf dividend yieldPaycom Software ROETeraWulf ROEPaycom Software operating marginTeraWulf operating marginPaycom Software revenue growthTeraWulf revenue growthPaycom Software free cash flowTeraWulf free cash flow
Paycom Software & TeraWulf appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 17, 2026.