Is NVDA or PM cheaper?

On trailing earnings, PM is cheaper: NVDA trades at a 31.68 P/E and PM at 27.73.

Which has grown faster, NVDA or PM?

Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — NVDA at a 68.23% CAGR versus PM at 7.19%.

Does NVDA or PM pay a bigger dividend?

NVDA yields 0.01% and PM yields 3.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is NVDA or PM more profitable?

NVDA runs the higher net margin — NVDA at 62.97% versus PM at 25.56%.

Which has been the better investment, NVDA or PM?

Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — NVDA at 65.42% versus PM at 12.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) vs Philip Morris International Inc. (PM)

NVDA leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though PM is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of NVIDIA Corporation and Philip Morris International Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

NVDA

NVIDIA Corporation

$5.01T

$206.84TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Philip Morris International Inc.

$300.80B

$193.00Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — NVDA vs PM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 18y

NVDA +47293.7%PM +816.1%NVDA compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

NVDA PM

NVDA vs PM: by the numbers

•NVDA is the larger company ($5.01T vs $300.80B market cap).
•PM trades at the lower earnings multiple (27.73 vs 31.68 P/E).
•NVDA converts more revenue to profit (62.97% vs 25.56% net margin).
•NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.23% vs 7.19% CAGR).
•PM pays the higher dividend yield (3.05% vs 0.01%).

Which is better, NVDA or PM?

Metric tally: NVDA 9 · PM 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValuePM(lower P/E)

GrowthNVDA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomePM(higher dividend yield)

QualityNVDA(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	NVDA	PM
P/E ratio	31.68	27.73●
Forward P/E	44.07	23.06●
P/S ratio	19.90	7.09●
P/B ratio	25.81	—
PEG ratio	0.57	0.36●
EV / EBITDA	30.48	19.59●
FCF yield	2.36%	3.54%●

Profitability

Metric	NVDA	PM
Gross margin	74.15%●	67.51%
Operating margin	64.02%●	37.75%
Net margin	62.97%●	25.56%
ROE	81.65%●	-113.55%
ROIC	62.88%●	25.56%

Dividends

Metric	NVDA	PM
Dividend yield	0.01%	3.05%●
Payout ratio	0.61%	80.88%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	NVDA	PM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	68.23%●	7.19%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	85.78%●	7.10%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	85.52%●	4.58%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	60.31%●	19.92%

Frequently asked

Which is better, NVDA or PM?: It depends on your goal. value: PM (lower P/E); growth: NVDA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PM (higher dividend yield); quality: NVDA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NVDA leads 9 to 7.
Is NVDA or PM cheaper?: On trailing earnings, PM is cheaper: NVDA trades at a 31.68 P/E and PM at 27.73.
Which has grown faster, NVDA or PM?: Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — NVDA at a 68.23% CAGR versus PM at 7.19%.
Does NVDA or PM pay a bigger dividend?: NVDA yields 0.01% and PM yields 3.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is NVDA or PM more profitable?: NVDA runs the higher net margin — NVDA at 62.97% versus PM at 25.56%.
Which has been the better investment, NVDA or PM?: Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — NVDA at 65.42% versus PM at 12.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.