Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)
PM and QCOM are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.
A side-by-side comparison of Philip Morris International Inc. and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
$193.00Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$166.97TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — PM vs QCOM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 18yPM +816.1%QCOM +557.6%PM compounded faster
PM QCOM
PM vs QCOM: by the numbers
- •PM is the larger company ($300.80B vs $175.99B market cap).
- •QCOM trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.92 vs 27.73 P/E).
- •PM converts more revenue to profit (25.56% vs 22.31% net margin).
- •QCOM grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.63% vs 7.19% CAGR).
- •PM pays the higher dividend yield (3.05% vs 2.15%).
Which is better, PM or QCOM?
Metric tally: PM 8 · QCOM 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueQCOM(lower P/E)
GrowthQCOM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomePM(higher dividend yield)
QualityPM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | PM | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 27.73 | 17.92● |
| Forward P/E | 23.06 | 15.50● |
| P/S ratio | 7.09 | 4.02● |
| P/B ratio | — | 6.56 |
| PEG ratio | 0.36● | 3.12 |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.59 | 14.36● |
| FCF yield | 3.54% | 6.98%● |
Profitability
| Metric | PM | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 67.51%● | 54.80% |
| Operating margin | 37.75%● | 25.52% |
| Net margin | 25.56%● | 22.31% |
| ROE | -113.55% | 36.38%● |
| ROIC | 25.56%● | 13.15% |
Dividends
| Metric | PM | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.05%● | 2.15% |
| Payout ratio | 80.88% | 70.95% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PM | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.19% | 8.63%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.10%● | 5.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.58% | 9.39%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 19.92%● | 5.13% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, PM or QCOM?
- It depends on your goal. value: QCOM (lower P/E); growth: QCOM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PM (higher dividend yield); quality: PM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is PM or QCOM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, QCOM is cheaper: PM trades at a 27.73 P/E and QCOM at 17.92.
- Which has grown faster, PM or QCOM?
- Over the past five years, QCOM grew revenue faster — PM at a 7.19% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
- Does PM or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?
- PM yields 3.05% and QCOM yields 2.15% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is PM or QCOM more profitable?
- PM runs the higher net margin — PM at 25.56% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
- Which has been the better investment, PM or QCOM?
- Over the past 10-year, QCOM delivered the higher annualized total return — PM at 12.25% versus QCOM at 13.61%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Philip Morris International P/E ratioQUALCOMM P/E ratioPhilip Morris International dividend yieldQUALCOMM dividend yieldPhilip Morris International ROEQUALCOMM ROEPhilip Morris International operating marginQUALCOMM operating marginPhilip Morris International revenue growthQUALCOMM revenue growthPhilip Morris International free cash flowQUALCOMM free cash flow
Philip Morris International & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.