Which has the lower trailing P/E, NA or PSIX?

NA has the lower trailing P/E: NA trades at 2.30 and PSIX at 6.77. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, NA or PSIX?

Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — NA at a 64.16% CAGR versus PSIX at 11.64%.

Is NA or PSIX more profitable?

NA runs the higher net margin — NA at 505.49% versus PSIX at 14.28%.

Nano Labs Ltd (NA) vs Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX)

A side-by-side comparison of Nano Labs Ltd and Power Solutions International, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: NA is classified in Technology; PSIX is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Nano Labs Ltd

$119M

$1.76TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

PSIX

Power Solutions International, Inc.

$643M

$27.90IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — NA vs PSIX

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4y

NA -98.4%PSIX +1403.0%PSIX compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

NA PSIX

NA vs PSIX: by the numbers

•PSIX is the larger company ($643M vs $119M market cap).
•NA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.30 vs 6.77 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NA converts more revenue to profit (505.49% vs 14.28% net margin).
•NA grew revenue faster over the past five years (64.16% vs 11.64% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	NA	PSIX
P/E ratio	2.30	6.77
Forward P/E	N/A	12.63
P/S ratio	11.40	0.97
P/B ratio	0.41	3.73
PEG ratio	N/A	0.18
EV / EBITDA	6.44	7.93
FCF yield	N/A	3.75%

Profitability

Metric	NA	PSIX
Gross margin	-147.33%	24.16%
Operating margin	-396.84%	13.48%
Net margin	505.49%	14.28%
ROE	17.96%	55.01%
ROIC	-10.96%	30.51%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	NA	PSIX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	64.16%	11.64%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	53.38%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	8.05%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	N/A	30.35%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, NA or PSIX?: NA has the lower trailing P/E: NA trades at 2.30 and PSIX at 6.77. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, NA or PSIX?: Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — NA at a 64.16% CAGR versus PSIX at 11.64%.
Is NA or PSIX more profitable?: NA runs the higher net margin — NA at 505.49% versus PSIX at 14.28%.

Go deeper

Full NA analysis Full PSIX analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Nano Labs P/E ratio Power Solutions International P/E ratio Nano Labs dividend yield Power Solutions International dividend yield Nano Labs ROE Power Solutions International ROE Nano Labs operating margin Power Solutions International operating margin Nano Labs revenue growth Power Solutions International revenue growth Nano Labs free cash flow Power Solutions International free cash flow

Nano Labs & Power Solutions International appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.