Is MTB or PRU cheaper?

On trailing earnings, PRU is cheaper: MTB trades at a 12.98 P/E and PRU at 10.85.

Which has grown faster, MTB or PRU?

Over the past five years, MTB grew revenue faster — MTB at a 14.97% CAGR versus PRU at 0.80%.

Does MTB or PRU pay a bigger dividend?

MTB yields 2.57% and PRU yields 5.18% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is MTB or PRU more profitable?

MTB runs the higher net margin — MTB at 23.71% versus PRU at 5.51%.

Which has been the better investment, MTB or PRU?

Over the past 10-year, MTB delivered the higher annualized total return — MTB at 10.67% versus PRU at 8.95%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) vs Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU)

MTB and PRU are evenly matched — 7 metrics each of 14.

A side-by-side comparison of M&T Bank Corporation and Prudential Financial, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

MTB

M&T Bank Corporation

$34.16B

$233.26Financial Services

PRU

Prudential Financial, Inc.

$36.91B

$106.26Financial Services

Total return — MTB vs PRU

growth of $100 · last 25y

MTB +227.4%PRU +262.7%PRU compounded faster

MTB PRU

MTB vs PRU: by the numbers

•PRU is the larger company ($36.91B vs $34.16B market cap).
•PRU trades at the lower earnings multiple (10.85 vs 12.98 P/E).
•MTB converts more revenue to profit (23.71% vs 5.51% net margin).
•MTB grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.97% vs 0.80% CAGR).
•PRU pays the higher dividend yield (5.18% vs 2.57%).

Which is better, MTB or PRU?

Metric tally: MTB 7 · PRU 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValuePRU(lower P/E)

GrowthMTB(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomePRU(higher dividend yield)

QualityMTB(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MTB	PRU
P/E ratio	12.98	10.85●
Forward P/E	12.48	7.76●
P/S ratio	2.95	0.59●
P/B ratio	1.31	1.16●
PEG ratio	0.73	0.32●

Profitability

Metric	MTB	PRU
Gross margin	75.31%●	32.90%
Operating margin	30.69%●	7.10%
Net margin	23.71%●	5.51%
ROE	10.48%	10.84%●
ROIC	6.75%●	0.68%

Dividends

Metric	MTB	PRU
Dividend yield	2.57%	5.18%●
Payout ratio	35.09%	54.13%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MTB	PRU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.97%●	0.80%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.46%●	-0.11%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	13.08%●	5.74%

Frequently asked

Which is better, MTB or PRU?: It depends on your goal. value: PRU (lower P/E); growth: MTB (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PRU (higher dividend yield); quality: MTB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
Is MTB or PRU cheaper?: On trailing earnings, PRU is cheaper: MTB trades at a 12.98 P/E and PRU at 10.85.
Which has grown faster, MTB or PRU?: Over the past five years, MTB grew revenue faster — MTB at a 14.97% CAGR versus PRU at 0.80%.
Does MTB or PRU pay a bigger dividend?: MTB yields 2.57% and PRU yields 5.18% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MTB or PRU more profitable?: MTB runs the higher net margin — MTB at 23.71% versus PRU at 5.51%.
Which has been the better investment, MTB or PRU?: Over the past 10-year, MTB delivered the higher annualized total return — MTB at 10.67% versus PRU at 8.95%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MTB analysis Full PRU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

M&T Bank P/E ratio Prudential Financial P/E ratio M&T Bank dividend yield Prudential Financial dividend yield M&T Bank ROE Prudential Financial ROE M&T Bank operating margin Prudential Financial operating margin M&T Bank revenue growth Prudential Financial revenue growth M&T Bank free cash flow Prudential Financial free cash flow

M&T Bank & Prudential Financial appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.