Is MSCI or MTB cheaper?

On trailing earnings, MTB is cheaper: MSCI trades at a 30.35 P/E and MTB at 13.16.

Which has grown faster, MSCI or MTB?

Over the past five years, MTB grew revenue faster — MSCI at a 12.56% CAGR versus MTB at 15.23%.

Does MSCI or MTB pay a bigger dividend?

MSCI yields 1.40% and MTB yields 2.40% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is MSCI or MTB more profitable?

MSCI runs the higher net margin — MSCI at 40.74% versus MTB at 24.40%.

Which has been the better investment, MSCI or MTB?

Over the past 10-year, MSCI delivered the higher annualized total return — MSCI at 22.17% versus MTB at 11.24%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

MSCI Inc. (MSCI) vs M&T Bank Corporation (MTB)

MTB leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of MSCI Inc. and M&T Bank Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

MSCI

MSCI Inc.

$40.04B

$550.79Financial ServicesAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

MTB

M&T Bank Corporation

$36.18B

$249.60Financial ServicesAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — MSCI vs MTB

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 19y

MSCI +2419.2%MTB +367.4%MSCI compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MSCI MTB

MSCI vs MTB: by the numbers

•MSCI is the larger company ($40.04B vs $36.18B market cap).
•MTB trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.16 vs 30.35 P/E).
•MSCI converts more revenue to profit (40.74% vs 24.40% net margin).
•MTB grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.23% vs 12.56% CAGR).
•MTB pays the higher dividend yield (2.40% vs 1.40%).

Which is better, MSCI or MTB?

Metric tally: MSCI 5 · MTB 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueMTB(lower P/E)

GrowthMTB(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeMTB(higher dividend yield)

QualityMSCI(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MSCI	MTB
P/E ratio	30.35	13.16●
Forward P/E	27.89	13.00●
P/S ratio	12.08	3.14●
P/B ratio	—	1.40
PEG ratio	3.48	0.73●

Profitability

Metric	MSCI	MTB
Gross margin	82.97%●	76.03%
Operating margin	55.66%●	33.19%
Net margin	40.74%●	24.40%
ROE	-45.29%	10.85%●
ROIC	35.34%●	6.75%

Dividends

Metric	MSCI	MTB
Dividend yield	1.40%	2.40%●
Payout ratio	49.42%	35.09%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MSCI	MTB
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.56%	15.23%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	16.73%●	11.46%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	0.11%	17.72%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, MSCI or MTB?: It depends on your goal. value: MTB (lower P/E); growth: MTB (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MTB (higher dividend yield); quality: MSCI (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MTB leads 8 to 5.
Is MSCI or MTB cheaper?: On trailing earnings, MTB is cheaper: MSCI trades at a 30.35 P/E and MTB at 13.16.
Which has grown faster, MSCI or MTB?: Over the past five years, MTB grew revenue faster — MSCI at a 12.56% CAGR versus MTB at 15.23%.
Does MSCI or MTB pay a bigger dividend?: MSCI yields 1.40% and MTB yields 2.40% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MSCI or MTB more profitable?: MSCI runs the higher net margin — MSCI at 40.74% versus MTB at 24.40%.
Which has been the better investment, MSCI or MTB?: Over the past 10-year, MSCI delivered the higher annualized total return — MSCI at 22.17% versus MTB at 11.24%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MSCI analysis Full MTB analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

MSCI P/E ratio M&T Bank P/E ratio MSCI dividend yield M&T Bank dividend yield MSCI ROE M&T Bank ROE MSCI operating margin M&T Bank operating margin MSCI revenue growth M&T Bank revenue growth MSCI free cash flow M&T Bank free cash flow

MSCI & M&T Bank appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.