Which has the lower trailing P/E, MS or WFC?

WFC has the lower trailing P/E: MS trades at 17.47 and WFC at 12.59. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MS or WFC?

Over the past five years, MS grew revenue faster — MS at a 18.41% CAGR versus WFC at 9.78%.

Does MS or WFC pay a bigger dividend?

MS yields 1.86% and WFC yields 2.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is MS or WFC more profitable?

WFC runs the higher net margin — MS at 15.99% versus WFC at 17.54%.

How have MS and WFC total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MS delivered 25.41% and WFC delivered 9.12% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Morgan Stanley (MS) vs Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)

A side-by-side comparison of Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo & Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Morgan Stanley

$333.74B

$211.59Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

WFC

Wells Fargo & Company

$265.84B

$86.87Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:02 PM EDT

Total return — MS vs WFC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y

MS +3534.4%WFC +2179.1%MS compounded faster

MS WFC

MS vs WFC: by the numbers

•MS is the larger company ($333.74B vs $265.84B market cap).
•WFC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.59 vs 17.47 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•WFC converts more revenue to profit (17.54% vs 15.99% net margin).
•MS grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.41% vs 9.78% CAGR).
•WFC pays the higher dividend yield (2.06% vs 1.86%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MS	WFC
P/E ratio	17.47	12.59
Forward P/E	16.68	12.02
P/S ratio	2.70	2.08
P/B ratio	2.99	1.49
PEG ratio	0.60	0.82

Profitability

Metric	MS	WFC
Gross margin	59.72%	64.50%
Operating margin	20.70%	21.17%
Net margin	15.99%	17.54%
ROE	17.70%	12.57%
ROIC	1.69%	3.16%

Dividends

Metric	MS	WFC
Dividend yield	1.86%	2.06%
Payout ratio	38.68%	28.17%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MS	WFC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	18.41%	9.78%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	9.56%	72.38%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	20.87%	16.70%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MS or WFC?: WFC has the lower trailing P/E: MS trades at 17.47 and WFC at 12.59. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MS or WFC?: Over the past five years, MS grew revenue faster — MS at a 18.41% CAGR versus WFC at 9.78%.
Does MS or WFC pay a bigger dividend?: MS yields 1.86% and WFC yields 2.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MS or WFC more profitable?: WFC runs the higher net margin — MS at 15.99% versus WFC at 17.54%.
How have MS and WFC total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MS delivered 25.41% and WFC delivered 9.12% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MS analysis Full WFC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Morgan Stanley P/E ratio Wells Fargo & P/E ratio Morgan Stanley dividend yield Wells Fargo & dividend yield Morgan Stanley ROE Wells Fargo & ROE Morgan Stanley operating margin Wells Fargo & operating margin Morgan Stanley revenue growth Wells Fargo & revenue growth Morgan Stanley free cash flow Wells Fargo & free cash flow

Morgan Stanley & Wells Fargo & appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.