Which has the lower trailing P/E, MS or WFC?

WFC has the lower trailing P/E: MS trades at 17.46 and WFC at 13.02. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MS or WFC?

Over the past five years, MS grew revenue faster — MS at a 18.41% CAGR versus WFC at 9.78%.

Does MS or WFC pay a bigger dividend?

MS yields 1.95% and WFC yields 2.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is MS or WFC more profitable?

WFC runs the higher net margin — MS at 15.99% versus WFC at 17.54%.

How have MS and WFC total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MS delivered 24.44% and WFC delivered 9.26% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Morgan Stanley (MS) vs Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)

A side-by-side comparison of Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo & Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Morgan Stanley

$338.14B

$214.38Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

WFC

Wells Fargo & Company

$272.95B

$90.26Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Total return — MS vs WFC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MS +809.1% (+24.7%/yr)WFC +137.2% (+9.0%/yr)MS compounded faster over this window

MS WFC

MS vs WFC: by the numbers

•MS is the larger company ($338.14B vs $272.95B market cap).
•WFC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (13.02 vs 17.46 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•WFC converts more revenue to profit (17.54% vs 15.99% net margin).
•MS grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.41% vs 9.78% CAGR).
•WFC pays the higher dividend yield (2.06% vs 1.95%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MS	WFC
P/E ratio	17.46	13.02
Forward P/E	16.62	12.38
P/S ratio	2.67	2.11
P/B ratio	3.06	1.51

Profitability

Metric	MS	WFC
Gross margin	59.72%	64.50%
Operating margin	20.70%	21.17%
Net margin	15.99%	17.54%
ROE	18.32%	12.57%

Dividends

Metric	MS	WFC
Dividend yield	1.95%	2.06%
Payout ratio	33.79%	26.70%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MS	WFC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	18.41%	9.78%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	9.56%	72.38%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	19.18%	17.97%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MS or WFC?: WFC has the lower trailing P/E: MS trades at 17.46 and WFC at 13.02. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MS or WFC?: Over the past five years, MS grew revenue faster — MS at a 18.41% CAGR versus WFC at 9.78%.
Does MS or WFC pay a bigger dividend?: MS yields 1.95% and WFC yields 2.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MS or WFC more profitable?: WFC runs the higher net margin — MS at 15.99% versus WFC at 17.54%.
How have MS and WFC total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MS delivered 24.44% and WFC delivered 9.26% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MS analysis Full WFC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Morgan Stanley P/E ratio Wells Fargo P/E ratio Morgan Stanley dividend yield Wells Fargo dividend yield Morgan Stanley ROE Wells Fargo ROE Morgan Stanley operating margin Wells Fargo operating margin Morgan Stanley revenue growth Wells Fargo revenue growth

Morgan Stanley & Wells Fargo appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.