Is MS or NVDA cheaper?

On trailing earnings, MS is cheaper: MS trades at a 19.46 P/E and NVDA at 31.42.

Which has grown faster, MS or NVDA?

Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — MS at a 17.47% CAGR versus NVDA at 68.23%.

Does MS or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?

MS yields 1.87% and NVDA yields 0.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is MS or NVDA more profitable?

NVDA runs the higher net margin — MS at 15.13% versus NVDA at 62.97%.

Which has been the better investment, MS or NVDA?

Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — MS at 27.20% versus NVDA at 68.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Morgan Stanley (MS) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)

NVDA leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics, though MS is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Morgan Stanley and NVIDIA Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Morgan Stanley

$337.60B

$214.04Financial Services

Total return — MS vs NVDA

growth of $100 · last 27y

MS +519.3%NVDA +500157.2%NVDA compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MS NVDA

MS vs NVDA: by the numbers

•NVDA is the larger company ($4.97T vs $337.60B market cap).
•MS trades at the lower earnings multiple (19.46 vs 31.42 P/E).
•NVDA converts more revenue to profit (62.97% vs 15.13% net margin).
•NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.23% vs 17.47% CAGR).
•MS pays the higher dividend yield (1.87% vs 0.01%).

Which is better, MS or NVDA?

Metric tally: MS 4 · NVDA 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueMS(lower P/E)

GrowthNVDA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeMS(higher dividend yield)

QualityNVDA(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MS	NVDA
P/E ratio	19.46●	31.42
Forward P/E	18.00	16.44●
P/S ratio	2.84●	19.74
P/B ratio	2.98●	25.60
PEG ratio	0.58	0.57
EV / EBITDA	—	25.96
FCF yield	—	2.38%

Profitability

Metric	MS	NVDA
Gross margin	57.99%	74.15%●
Operating margin	19.48%	64.02%●
Net margin	15.13%	62.97%●
ROE	15.91%	81.65%●
ROIC	1.69%	62.88%●

Dividends

Metric	MS	NVDA
Dividend yield	1.87%●	0.01%
Payout ratio	38.68%	0.61%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MS	NVDA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	17.47%	68.23%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	9.56%	85.78%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	—	85.52%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	22.22%	63.05%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, MS or NVDA?: It depends on your goal. value: MS (lower P/E); growth: NVDA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MS (higher dividend yield); quality: NVDA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NVDA leads 9 to 4.
Is MS or NVDA cheaper?: On trailing earnings, MS is cheaper: MS trades at a 19.46 P/E and NVDA at 31.42.
Which has grown faster, MS or NVDA?: Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — MS at a 17.47% CAGR versus NVDA at 68.23%.
Does MS or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?: MS yields 1.87% and NVDA yields 0.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MS or NVDA more profitable?: NVDA runs the higher net margin — MS at 15.13% versus NVDA at 62.97%.
Which has been the better investment, MS or NVDA?: Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — MS at 27.20% versus NVDA at 68.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.